Albuquerque Journal

Trump’s planned environmen­tal rollbacks hit major roadblocks

Activists slam EPA plan to shelve methane rules

- BY EVAN HALPER TRIBUNE WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON — As President Donald Trump flouts internatio­nal calls to act on climate change, his administra­tion is finding the pressure at home tougher to ignore.

The limitation­s of Trump’s power to reset U.S. climate policy have been on full display over the past few days in Washington. White House plans to scrap restrictio­ns on the release of a potent greenhouse gas are getting stymied by the courts, by forceful public opposition and even by Republican­s in Congress.

The administra­tion’s struggle to free oil and gas companies from Obamaera limits on how much methane they can release into the air reflects the challenge Trump faces in carrying out his “America first” energy policy. Signing executive orders and making speeches were the easy part. Pushing policies to fruition is proving more complicate­d.

The thicket of legal issues entangling the administra­tion on methane comes as it is facing an onslaught on another environmen­tal front. Its plans to roll back national monument protection­s — ordered by Trump himself — are about to enter a crucial stage and the wind is hardly at the back of the White House as it does.

About 2.5 million Americans have submitted comments as Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke prepares to announce which public lands would lose protection­s. A large sampling analyzed by the Center for Western Priorities found just 1 percent of the comments expressed support for the Trump plan.

The fight over methane — a gas that accelerate­s global warming at 25 times the rate of carbon — has also proved more fraught than the administra­tion may have anticipate­d.

After three GOP senators defected from party leaders to vote down a bill that would have scrapped the methane rules on public land, the administra­tion moved to go it alone. It used executive authority to put on hold the public land rule and an even furtherrea­ching methane rule the Environmen­tal Protection Agency is scheduled to enforce nationwide.

But the administra­tion found itself stymied again last week, when a federal court ruled that the EPA didn’t have the authority to delay enforcemen­t by even 90 days.

By Monday, emboldened activists were making a show of force at EPA headquarte­rs in Washington, where scores of them appeared to testify against the agency’s broader plan to shelve the methane rules for two years, which appeared unlikely given the court ruling. They vastly outnumbere­d oil and gas industry representa­tives at the hearing and presented an unflatteri­ng picture for the administra­tion.

One mother from Texas showed an X-ray of an asthmatic child’s lungs, which she said had been damaged by release of the gas. Another mother from Pennsylvan­ia explained how her daughter carried around a personal air monitor that often goes off when she is at school, which is within half a mile of 22 wells. Religious leaders told EPA officials they should be ashamed.

“How can anyone with any moral sensibilit­y possibly believe that knowingly doing harm to children when the same could be avoided is acceptable?” asked the Rev. Alison Cornish of the advocacy group Pennsylvan­ia Interfaith Power and Light. “It would be unconscion­able not to uphold this rule.”

Reversing course on methane was not supposed to be so challengin­g for Trump. The rules at issue were completed late in the Obama administra­tion, and were pilloried by the oil and gas industry as an unnecessar­y nuisance.

But the fierce public opposition moved lawmakers to waver, and the administra­tion found itself battling alone.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States