Albuquerque Journal

STALEMATE AGAIN ON HEALTH CARE

Calls come for bipartisan package that would cover ‘most vulnerable people’

- BY SEAN SULLIVAN, JULIET EILPERIN AND KELSEY SNELL THE WASHINGTON POST

After GOP Senate leaders drop a health care overhaul bill, prospects for a bipartisan approach are still murky.

WASHINGTON — Senate Republican­s decided Tuesday not to hold a vote on unwinding the Affordable Care Act, effectivel­y preserving the landmark 2010 law for the foreseeabl­e future.

Today is the deadline for insurers to sign contracts with the federal government so that they can sell health plans on the ACA marketplac­es for 2018. Many companies are hiking these rates by double digits, but they have suggested they would curb such increases if they had assurances that the federal government would provide cost-sharing reduction payments for all of next year.

At the moment, the Trump administra­tion is covering costsharin­g payments only on a month-to-month basis; a White House official confirmed Tuesday that it had made a payment for September. Asked whether the president intended to continue making payments going forward, the aide said officials have not yet decided what to do.

Republican­s accepted the reality on Monday evening that the push had sputtered out.

The developmen­t amounted to a major setback for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and President Donald Trump, who spent the past week trying to rally support for a last-ditch attempt to fulfill a long-standing promise before a Senate rule that allows a simple-majority vote on the measure expires at the end of the month.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Trump said he was “disappoint­ed in certain so-called Republican­s” who would not back the Graham-Cassidy bill.

Republican leaders could call on Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., to revive negotiatio­ns with Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., on a bipartisan package to stabilize the current insurance marketplac­es.

On Tuesday, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., reiterated his party’s willingnes­s to work with Republican­s to fix the current health care law — if they abandoned their effort to undo it altogether.

Some congressio­nal Republican­s, such as Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla., who represents a swing district, echoed that call.

“I think the time for partisan health care reform has passed, and we should focus on a bipartisan package that provides some regulatory relief, especially on the employer mandate,” Curbelo told reporters, “and also guarantees [cost-sharing subsidies] for the most vulnerable people.”

Many Republican­s, however, oppose legislatio­n that would approve the subsidies without reforming the ACA insurance market. “If you mean by ‘fixing Obamacare’ just dishing more money out to insurance companies, then no,” Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, told reporters Monday, referring to a nickname for the Affordable Care Act.

At the moment, neither party’s proposal to address the law’s current problems has enough votes to pass. Sen. Collins announced Monday that she would not back Graham-Cassidy - which would redistribu­te federal health-care funding across the country and sharply curb spending on Medicaid - moments after the release of a much-anticipate­d Congressio­nal Budget Office analysis that forecast “millions” of Americans would lose coverage by 2026.

Two GOP senators - Rand Paul, Ky., and John McCain, Ariz. already had come out against the measure and were not swayed by a new draft that emerged Monday morning.

Republican­s hold a 52-to-48 advantage in the Senate.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., flanked by Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., left, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., right, speaks to reporters as they faced assured defeat on unwinding ‘Obamacare.’
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/ASSOCIATED PRESS Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., flanked by Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., left, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., right, speaks to reporters as they faced assured defeat on unwinding ‘Obamacare.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States