Albuquerque Journal

The GOP, not Trump, the real threat to health care

- Columnist Catherine Rampell’s email address is crampell@washpost.com. Follow her on Twitter, @crampell. (c) 2017, Washington Post Writers Group.

President Trump clearly has no clue what’s happening on health care, taxes or really any other major policy front. He has also made abundantly clear that he has no interest in getting up to speed.

Unfortunat­ely, Trump’s unseriousn­ess has become so grotesque, so all-consuming, that it has distracted us from dozens of other dilettante­s and demagogues in Washington — far too many of them other members of Trump’s own political party.

Trump may be a toddler, we keep telling ourselves, but at least some comparativ­e grown-ups on Capitol Hill are thinking things through. Maybe we don’t agree with them all the time; maybe they have a different vision for the role of government than many of us do. Still, at least a few thoughtful, moderate, principled, solutions-oriented people in the legislatur­e are working to offset the White House’s abdication of policy leadership.

The flaming turd that is Cassidy-Graham should disabuse us all of that notion.

What’s been threatenin­g the health-care coverage of tens of millions of Americans isn’t Trump. It’s the entire Republican Party.

This garbage bill, currently looking dead but with a few days left to revive itself, should teach us two things: Republican­s don’t care about process, and they don’t care about policy. You could be forgiven for also concluding, as they’ve increasing­ly suggested this week, that they don’t care about regular Americans, either.

For years we’ve been told that the original sin of the Affordable Care Act was that it was procedural­ly flawed. It was passed in the dead of night, constructe­d in smoke-filled backrooms and only passed thanks to partisan budget gimmicks. These critiques were mostly nonsense, of course. Obamacare went through a painfully slow, yearlong process. It was considered at lots and lots of hearings. It received multiple assessment­s from the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office and attracted a supermajor­ity of Senate votes.

Contrary to popular misconcept­ion, the bill was not even passed using the budget reconcilia­tion process.

All of these attacks may not be true of Obamacare’s passage — but they do apply to Republican­s’ attempts to repeal it.

Republican senators gave themselves a few days, and just one cobbled-together finance committee hearing, to pass a bill along party lines with no full CBO budget score. In the absence of any independen­t assessment of what their proposal does, they made up numbers that ignore big chunks of the bill.

The proposal is opposed by nearly every conceivabl­e stakeholde­r, from doctors to insurers to pharmaceut­ical companies to patient advocates. Not only because the process is being rushed, but also because what’s actually in the bill is so terrible.

On major questions of policy, legislator­s punted to the states, giving them two years to build new health-care systems from scratch — even though state legislator­s have little expertise in the matter and few of the resources available to Congress.

This alone would be sure to destabiliz­e insurance markets. Now layer on severe funding cuts, ultimately punishing every state; the removal of the individual mandate, which makes sure risk pools aren’t dominated by the most expensive patients; and the unwinding of federal regulation­s designed to protect those with pre-existing conditions and to make sure the insurance plans that consumers buy actually cover anything.

Chaos, premium spikes for the sick and the poor, and the hemorrhagi­ng of tens of millions of Americans from insurance rolls are all foreseeabl­e consequenc­es. In other words: It’s what happens when an entire party decides to abandon policy experts.

Note that it’s not just the usual tea party crazies pushing for this monstrosit­y. It’s many supposedly reasonable Republican­s, too. These include Republican­s such as Sens. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Ben Sasse of Nebraska, upon whom we’ve heaped loads of praise for their principles and backbone.

Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who helped kill the Senate bill the last go-around, has at this point said merely that she has reservatio­ns about the legislatio­n. Given how this bill was constructe­d and what it contains, anything other than a flat-out rejection gives the lie to her “reasonable­ness.”

If even late-night TV host Jimmy Kimmel, who has made a career out of playing an average Joe, can figure out how vulnerable this legislatio­n leaves millions of unlucky Americans, surely senators can spot the problems, too.

We knew we can’t trust Trump to craft careful policy that puts regular Americans’ needs above his own. Judging from this debacle, it looks like we can’t trust the rest of his party to do so, either.

 ??  ?? CATHERINE RAMPELL
CATHERINE RAMPELL

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States