Albuquerque Journal

Leak won’t affect pipeline decision

Critics say spill leak is an example of what they see as the risks to the environmen­t

- BY GRANT SCHULTE AND JAMES NORD

LINCOLN, Neb. — Discovery of a 210,000-gallon oil leak from the Keystone pipeline would seem to be poor timing four days before regulators in Nebraska decide whether to allow a major expansion of the system, but officials say state law does not allow pipeline safety to be a factor in their decision.

The Nebraska Public Service Commission was scheduled to rule Monday if a Keystone XL expansion pipeline proposed by TransCanad­a Corp. can cross the state. The commission’s decision is the last major regulatory hurdle for a project that has faced numerous local, state and federal reviews and lawsuits since it was announced in 2008.

Keystone operator TransCanad­a Corp. shut down the existing pipeline early Thursday morning and workers were testing to determine the cause of the spill on agricultur­al land in Marshall County, South Dakota, near the North Dakota border, about 250 miles west of Minneapoli­s.

State and company officials said the spill was not a threat to waterways or drinking water, but critics were quick to use the leak as an example of what they see as the risks to the environmen­t.

The Nebraska vote Monday will be on a proposed route for Keystone XL, a massive expansion that also would be operated by TransCanad­a. The new pipeline would carry an estimated 830,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil sands areas of Canada through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska, where it would connect with the existing Keystone pipeline.

The decision will hinge on testimony and documents generated from public hearings over the summer and from more than 500,000 public comments, Nebraska Public Service Commission spokeswoma­n Deb Collins said. A state law passed in 2011 prevents the commission from factoring pipeline safety or the possibilit­y of leaks into its decisions.

“The commission’s decision … will be based on the evidence in the record,” Collins said.

The Keystone XL proposal has faced intense opposition in Nebraska from a coalition of environmen­tal groups, Native American tribes and some landowners who don’t want the pipeline running through their property.

Nebraska lawmakers gave the fivemember commission the power to regulate major oil pipelines in 2011 in response to a public outcry over the pipeline and its potential impact on the Sandhills, an ecological­ly fragile region of grass-covered sand dunes.

But when they passed the law, legislator­s argued that pipeline safety is a federal responsibi­lity and should not factor in the state decision.

Opponents of Keystone XL are incensed that the leak won’t be considered.

“There is a reason TransCanad­a and the big oil lobby did not want this informatio­n on the record,” said Jane Kleeb, director of the Bold Alliance, a coalition of groups that have opposed the Keystone XL for nearly a decade.

President Donald Trump issued a federal permit for the expansion project in March even though it had been rejected by the Obama administra­tion.

The existing Keystone pipeline, where the leak was discovered, transports crude from Canada to refineries in Illinois and a major storage hub in Oklahoma, passing through the eastern Dakotas, Nebraska, Kansas and Missouri. It can handle nearly 600,000 barrels daily, or about 23 million gallons.

Since 2010, companies have reported 17 spills of oil or petroleum products in the U.S. the same size or larger than the leak announced Thursday, according to U.S. Department of Transporta­tion records.

Officials in South Dakota said they weren’t notified about the leak until roughly five hours after TransCanad­a discovered it. Brian Walsh, an environmen­tal scientist manager at the South Dakota Department of Environmen­t and Natural Resources, said officials would likely inquire about the delay but were focusing immediatel­y on the spill.

TransCanad­a said Friday the leak was controlled and posed no threat to public safety. The company has sent more than 75 workers to the spill site, including environmen­tal, engineerin­g and emergency response specialist­s.

 ?? JEFF MCINTOSH/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? A sign for TransCanad­a’s Keystone pipeline facilities in Hardisty, Alberta, Canada. The pipeline leaked oil onto agricultur­al land in South Dakota.
JEFF MCINTOSH/THE CANADIAN PRESS A sign for TransCanad­a’s Keystone pipeline facilities in Hardisty, Alberta, Canada. The pipeline leaked oil onto agricultur­al land in South Dakota.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States