Support accord in PNM rate case

WHILE I shall defer to my esteemed counterparts at the Public Regulation Commission regarding utility regulation, I do represent ratepayers in District 22 and I wanted to take this opportunity to explain what I look for when the Legislature is considering issues that affect the taxpayer.

If possible, I look for multi-party consensus. While difficult to attain, given separate agendas and viewpoints on behalf of affected parties, it is possible after cooperation and compromise. In this spirit, our state Attorney General, PNM, the Sierra Club, the Coalition for Clean and Affordable Energy as well as Western Resources Advocates are all signatories of a revised stipulated agreement designed to “reach a fair, just, and reasonable resolution … consistent with public interest” in PNM’s current rate case before the PRC.

In addition to the aforementioned signers, the PRC’s own Utility Division staff has signed on to the stipulated agreement. As a single member of a body of 112 legislators, who sits on multiple committees reviewing hundreds of bills, I can attest that staff recommendations are crucial and extremely valuable.

Appropriately, language in the revised stipulated agreement allows for PNM to use its savings from the federal tax bill currently in conference committee (corporate tax rate reduced to 20 percent from 35 percent), to mitigate costs to their customers. Commissioners should be weighing this potential customer benefit heavily when they vote on the revised stipulated agreement.

Please call your commissioner, as I will, and urge them to vote for the revised stipulated agreement, Case No. 16-00276-UT. I would argue that a vote for the stipulated agreement further nurtures collaboration and compromise between environmentalists and the utilities, and is a welldeserved affirmation of PRC staff.