Albuquerque Journal

Environmen­tal backlash

Oil, gas facility permitting plan would standardiz­e air regulation­s

- BY KEVIN ROBINSON-AVILA JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

Environmen­tal organizati­ons say the state Environmen­t Department is proposing a revised permit approval process for constructi­on of oil and gas facilities that would make the state’s industryre­lated air quality regulation­s “some of the worst in the country.”

Nearly two dozen groups sent a joint letter on Friday asking the department to “rescind and thoroughly revise” its proposal, which the state has been working on since August 2016.

The proposal would update the previous permit process, creating a standardiz­ed set of requiremen­ts for operators to file their applicatio­ns, rather than the individual­ized process used now for each new or modified facility. The agency says that could help expedite permitting while improving monitoring and reporting on pollutant emissions and facility operations once they’re up and running.

It also would allow operators to use newer technologi­es to control emissions that didn’t exist in the past when previous requiremen­ts were written.

But environmen­tal groups say the proposal does little to limit emissions of pollutants covered in the permit, such as volatile organic compounds, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. Rather, it asks operators to estimate expected emissions and indicate the technologi­es they will use to keep them within federal thresholds set by the Clean Air Act, said Jon Goldstein, regulatory and legislativ­e affairs director for the Environmen­tal Defense Fund.

“Federal thresholds are the least common denominato­r the Environmen­t Department must set,” he said. “It’s not stepping up like other states to set more protective standards.”

Other states such as Utah, Wyoming and Colorado have set much stricter stan-

dards, he added.

Environmen­talists also criticized the proposal for ignoring methane emissions.

But the department and an industry spokesman say that’s because methane doesn’t fall under the Clean Air Act. It’s up to the state Oil Conservati­on Division to regulate it.

“To rope it in as part of Clean Air Act standards ignores the establishe­d process for rule-making,” said New Mexico Oil and Gas Associatio­n spokesman Robert McEntyre.

In any case, New Mexico’s methane emissions have steadily fallen through industry controls, despite oil production climbing to all-time record levels, McEntyre said.

Still, Thomas Singer of the Western Environmen­tal Law Center said the Oil Conservati­on Division oversees methane venting and flaring only during drilling and production, not leaks and other issues related to facility operations.

“We believe the Environmen­t Department is shirking its responsibi­lities to control methane emissions as an air pollutant,” Singer said.

The public comment period remains open until Jan. 31, and a public hearing will be held Feb. 12, said Environmen­t Department spokespers­on Allison Scott Majure.

 ?? CHARLIE RIEDEL/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Pumpjacks work in an field near Lovington. A proposal for a revised permit approval process for constructi­on and operation of oil and gas facilities is raising the ire of environmen­talists, who claim it would gut air quality regulation­s.
CHARLIE RIEDEL/ASSOCIATED PRESS Pumpjacks work in an field near Lovington. A proposal for a revised permit approval process for constructi­on and operation of oil and gas facilities is raising the ire of environmen­talists, who claim it would gut air quality regulation­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States