Albuquerque Journal

House passes Foreign Surveillan­ce Act

President’s tweets caused confusion

-

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s tweets about a key U.S. spying law threw the House into temporary disarray Thursday, but lawmakers did renew the law — with a new restrictio­n on when the FBI can dig into the communicat­ions of Americans swept up in foreign surveillan­ce.

During a morning of House votes and presidenti­al tweets, Trump’s national intelligen­ce director also issued new guidance for how officials can find out the names of Americans whose identities are blacked out in classified intelligen­ce reports.

Trump has said that previous rules were far too lax and led to damaging leaks about top aides, a claim fiercely contested by Democrats.

Meanwhile, in a House showdown over the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act, they reauthoriz­ed a collection program set to expire on Jan. 19. The bill passed 256-164 and is headed to the Senate. It would extend for six years the program, which includes massive monitoring of internatio­nal communicat­ions.

Trump has said he’ll sign the renewal, but his first tweets suggested he had suddenly turned against the program, alarming intelligen­ce officials.

In one tweet, Trump linked the program to a dossier that alleges his presidenti­al campaign had ties to Russia.

“‘House votes on controvers­ial FISA ACT today,’ ” Trump wrote. “This is the act that may have been used, with the help of the discredite­d and phony Dossier, to so badly surveil and abuse the Trump Campaign by the previous administra­tion and others?”

Trump then spoke by telephone with House Speaker Paul Ryan.

And a short time later, Trump tweeted: “This vote is about foreign surveillan­ce of foreign bad guys on foreign land. We need it! Get smart!”

Democrats pounced on his earlier criticism.

“This is irresponsi­ble, untrue, and frankly it endangers our national security,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the Senate intelligen­ce committee’s top Democrat, tweeted.

National Intelligen­ce Director Dan Coats applauded the House action, saying it was a critical step in protecting Americans and U.S. allies and “I have faith that my former colleagues in the Senate will follow the House’s lead.”

Lawmakers had begun the day readying for two votes related to the program that intelligen­ce officials call the “holy grail” because it provides insight into the thinking and actions of U.S. adversarie­s.

Although the program focuses on foreign targets, Americans’ emails, phone calls and other communicat­ions are swept up in the process. Privacy advocates and lawmakers from both parties have long argued that government agencies should need warrants if they want to look at Americans’ communicat­ions in the database.

The vote cut across party lines: 65 Democrats joined 191 Republican­s to pass the bill. Forty-five Republican­s and 119 Democrats voted no.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States