Albuquerque Journal

Suit filed over end to temporary protected status

Racism alleged as basis for move

- ASSOCIATED PRESS

SAN FRANCISCO — The Trump administra­tion’s decision to end a program that lets immigrants from four countries live and work legally in the U.S. was motivated by racism and leaves the immigrants’ American born children with an “impossible choice,” according to a federal lawsuit filed on Monday.

Nine immigrants and five children filed the suit in federal court in San Francisco to reinstate temporary protected status for people from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua and Sudan.

The status is granted to countries ravaged by natural disasters or war. It lets citizens of those countries remain in the U.S. until the situation improves back home.

The lawsuit — at least the third challengin­g the administra­tion’s decision to end temporary protected status — cites President Donald Trump’s vulgar language during a meeting in January to describe African countries.

“They did it because of xenophobia, and we need to make sure that we say it loudly so that everyone knows,” said Martha Arevalo, executive director of the immigrant advocacy group, Central American Resource Center.

Arevalo spoke at a rally to announce the lawsuit outside the federal courthouse in San Francisco that was attended by some of the plaintiffs and dozens of demonstrat­ors, some carrying signs that read, “Let Our People Stay.”

One of the plaintiffs, Cristina Morales, said she came to the U.S. in 1993 at the age of 12 after fleeing El Salvador to escape domestic violence. She received temporary protected status in 2001 and now works as an after-school teacher in the San Francisco Bay Area.

She was accompanie­d at the rally by her 14-year-old daughter, Crista Ramos, who along with her 11-yearold son, Diego Ramos, are U.S. citizens.

“I don’t want the government to split my family and to lose my home, my friends and the opportunit­y for a good education,” Crista said.

Morales, 37, her voice quivering with emotion, said she has nothing to go back to in El Salvador.

“If I pay taxes, health insurance, my house and the education of my children, what I have done wrong,” she said.

The lawsuit names the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as a defendant. The department declined to comment on pending litigation.

More than 200,000 immigrants could face deportatio­n because of the change in policy, and they have more than 200,000 American children who risk being uprooted from their communitie­s and schools, according to plaintiffs in the case filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and other immigrant advocates.

The children face the “impossible choice” of leaving their country with their parents or staying without them, according to the suit.

“These American children should not have to choose between their country and their family,” Ahilan Arulananth­am, advocacy and legal director of the ACLU of Southern California, said in a statement.

It’s the latest lawsuit filed against the Trump administra­tion over its crackdown on immigratio­n. A case filed last month by Haitian and Salvadoran immigrants in Massachuse­tts also alleges the decision to end temporary protected status was racially motivated. The NAACP has filed a separate lawsuit in Maryland on behalf of Haitian immigrants who received temporary protected status.

The program was created for humanitari­an reasons, and the status can be renewed by the U.S. government following an evaluation.

 ?? JEFF CHIU/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Emi MacLean, attorney with National Day Laborers Organizing Network, left, stands next to plaintiffs announcing a lawsuit against the Trump administra­tion Monday.
JEFF CHIU/ASSOCIATED PRESS Emi MacLean, attorney with National Day Laborers Organizing Network, left, stands next to plaintiffs announcing a lawsuit against the Trump administra­tion Monday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States