Albuquerque Journal

Republican­s urge Trump to lay off Mueller

Party leaders not moving to protect special counsel

- ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — More Republican­s are telling President Donald Trump in ever blunter terms to lay off his escalating criticism of special counsel Robert Mueller and the Russia probe. But party leaders are taking no action to protect Mueller, embracing a familiar strategy with the president — simply waiting out the storm.

Trump blistered Mueller and his investigat­ion all weekend on Twitter and started in again on Monday, questionin­g the probe’s legitimacy with language no recent president has used for a federal inquiry. “A total WITCH HUNT with massive conflicts of interest!” Trump tweeted.

Mueller is leading a criminal probe into whether Trump’s 2016 presidenti­al campaign had ties to Russia and whether there has been obstructio­n of justice since then.

Trump was told to cut it out on Sunday by such notable Republican­s as Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, and Bob Corker, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Then on Monday he was told that firing Mueller would be “the stupidest thing the president could do” by Orrin Hatch, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

But Hatch, on CNN, also said he didn’t see any need for legislatio­n to protect Mueller. And that sentiment was widely echoed by GOP leaders.

In recent months, bills to protect the special counsel have stalled, and Republican leaders have stuck to muted statements endorsing Mueller or denying he is in trouble. So far, that tactic has worked for them as Trump has lambasted the Russia investigat­ion on Twitter but allowed Mueller to continue his work.

Democrats say legislatio­n is needed.

“Immediatel­y,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticu­t. And Arizona Republican Jeff Flake, a frequent Trump critic, said, “If you don’t pick this fight, then we might as well not be here.”

But GOP leaders saw no reason to leap to stop a firing they don’t think is in sight.

“I don’t think that’s going to happen so I just think it’s not necessary, and obviously legislatio­n requires a presidenti­al signature,” said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate. “I don’t see the necessity of picking that fight right now.”

Still, Cornyn said there would be “a number of unintended consequenc­es” if Mueller were to be removed, and lawmakers had communicat­ed that message to Trump “informally and formally.”

White House lawyer Ty Cobb issued a statement Sunday tamping down the speculatio­n, saying Trump is not “considerin­g or discussing” Mueller’s removal. White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said Trump has “some well-establishe­d frustratio­n” about the probe but insisted there is no internal discussion about removing Mueller.

Separately, Trump’s legal team has provided documents to Mueller summarizin­g their views on key matters being investigat­ed, according to a person familiar with the situation.

The records were given as Trump’s lawyers negotiate with Mueller’s team about the scope and terms of a possible interview with the president.

Also, Trump added a new lawyer. Joseph diGenova, a former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, will join his team later this week.

DiGenova has been outspoken in his defense of Trump, talking of a “brazen plot” to exonerate Hillary Clinton in an email investigat­ion and to “frame” Trump with a “falsely created crime.”

Multiple White House officials said Monday that they believe Trump is now acutely aware of the political — and even legal — consequenc­es of taking action against Mueller. For now, they predicted, Trump will snipe at Mueller from the outside.

 ??  ?? Robert Mueller
Robert Mueller

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States