Albuquerque Journal

Water board notes concern over KAFB leak cleanup

Members say their input is not being considered in formulatin­g a strategy

- BY MADDY HAYDEN JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

Members of the Albuquerqu­e Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority governing board expressed concerns in a meeting Wednesday that the New Mexico Environmen­t Department and U.S. Air Force are adopting a more passive strategy when it comes to cleaning up the jet fuel leak that spread from Kirtland Air Force Base for decades.

Those concerns were largely spurred by the NMED’s 2018 Strategic Plan for dealing with the fuel plume, which rests in the same aquifer Albuquerqu­e gets its drinking water from. A draft of the plan was released earlier this month.

“Clearly, there’s a change in the focus on natural attenuatio­n,” said Bernalillo County Commission­er Maggie Hart Stebbins, sitting on the board as an alternate for Commission­er Steven Michael Quezada.

Stebbins cited a difference in language used in previous years’ plans.

NMED’s Chief Scientist Dennis McQuillen attempted to clarify the plan’s meaning.

“Neither the Air Force nor the Environmen­t Department are proposing natural attenuatio­n as a final corrective measure,” McQuillen said.

Rather, by monitoring the natural degradatio­n of the fuel constituen­ts, largely due to naturally occurring bacteria, McQuillen said the data gleaned from those observatio­ns will aid in identifyin­g the measures ultimately taken to remediate the plume.

McQuillen also stated that the strategic plan is not a regulatory document, but is intended to inform the public about the upcoming year’s activities on the cleanup project.

Rick Shean, the water utility authority’s water rights program manager, expressed similar concerns over the plan and several other issues in a memo sent to NMED on Tuesday.

He also wrote that the author-

THE WATER AUTHORITY COMMENTS AND STAFF HAVE BEEN SIDELINED IN THE STAKEHOLDE­R AND TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP PROCESS. RICK SHEAN WATER UTILITY AUTHORITY

ity’s input is not being considered in the process.

“The Water Authority comments and staff have been sidelined in the stakeholde­r and technical working group process, which represents a breakdown of the partnershi­p success that has been touted for the site since 2015,” Shean wrote.

Other concerns included inadequaci­es in an EPA-mandated report submitted by the Air Force to NMED last year and the incomplete characteri­zation of the plume’s light, non-aqueous phase liquid located between the surface of the groundwate­r and the soil.

McQuillen said he had received the memo only the night before and hadn’t yet studied all of its 13 concerns.

“I think it (the memo) reflects some misunderst­andings and we want to meet with the water authority and discuss this,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States