Albuquerque Journal

Will 2018 finally be the real year of the woman?

- KATHLEEN PARKER Columnist

WASHINGTON — How many times have we heard that this is the year of the woman?

Let’s just say, several. Each decade for the past century or so seems to have presented a fresh feature to justify yet another proclamati­on of historic import.

From suffrage (1920) to the pill (1960) and to legalized abortion (1973) to Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine (1972) to “Reviving Ophelia” (1994) — fast-forwarding to the recent pink-capped Women’s March (2017) and the #metoo movement (2017) — women have been pushing their way forward to reach parity with men.

Many of the original goals have been reached. Women now outnumber men in college, graduate schools and medical and law schools; three of the nine Supreme Court justices are female; and, incrementa­lly, women are reaching the dubious objective of serving alongside men in combat roles.

But one area where women remain underrepre­sented is in state legislatur­es, governor’s offices and the U.S. Congress, the final frontiers for the battles that matter most.

If intentions become reality in November, then 2018 really may be the Year of the Woman. And to whom should we pay homage?

None other than President Donald J. Trump.

Thanks to a series of issues and comments underscori­ng his apparent contempt for women who aren’t subservien­t to his appetites, political or otherwise, the “weaker sex” is fighting back. At least 431 women are running or are likely to run for the House this year — 339 Democrats and 92 Republican­s, according to the Center for American Women and Politics. Two years ago, the number at this point was 212.

On the Senate side, an astonishin­g 50 women are running or are likely to run, twice the number as in 2016. In some states, the deadline for filing hasn’t occurred yet.

More staggering still, Emily’s List, a Democratic organizati­on that supports only pro-choice women, reports having received 34,000 requests this year for informatio­n about running for public office. Let me say it again: 34,000. In 2016, only about 920 made similar queries — and that was record-breaking.

Republican­s have plenty to worry about with this range of interest and momentum. If women can flip 23 seats from red to blue, Democrats can take back the House. Given the level of intensity, this seems every bit as likely in 2018 as it was for Republican­s in 2010, when the midterms saw a surge of tea party candidates who ran primarily against “Obamacare” — and won.

The Republican-led Senate could also be in jeopardy. If Democrats can keep all 10 of their female senators in place and also win two seats with candidates being backed by Emily’s List — Rep. Jacky Rosen of Nevada and Rep. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona — the Senate would also turn blue.

That’s a lot of ifs. But again, intensity favors women this year. And candidates such as Rosen, a computer programmer currently in a dead heat with incumbent Sen. Dean Heller, makes clear that she is running against Trump.

“We can find smart solutions in Washington,” she says in a fundraisin­g plea on her campaign website, “but only if we stand up to Donald Trump’s hatred, bigotry and narcissism.”

Sinema, however, has taken a different approach, crediting her hard work as well as help from “family, church and, sometimes, even the government” for her rise from childhood homelessne­ss to the House of Representa­tives.

If she secures the Senate nomination, she would probably face a tough opponent in Republican Kelli Ward, who touts herself as “very conservati­ve” and whom John McCain defeated last time around. But Ward is also known for her brashness. When McCain’s brain tumor was discovered, Ward said that he should retire and that she should be considered as his replacemen­t.

Although the national momentum is being driven primarily by Democrats — and Republican­s aren’t as likely to criticize the president — Republican women aren’t twiddling their thumbs. The Center for American Women and Politics reports 92 GOP women are running for the House, 21 for the Senate and 31 for governorsh­ips. And with candidates such as Rep. Martha McSally, a retired pilot and commander in the U.S. Air Force — who loves dogs — the conservati­ve female stereotype has been forever shattered.

In a perfect world, voters would choose candidates without considerat­ion of gender. But clearly, we do not live in such a world, which has been made worse by the current occupant in the White House and his supporters in Congress. The scope and magnitude of Trump’s offensiven­ess to many women cannot be overestima­ted.

Nor would it be wise to underestim­ate women’s determinat­ion to clean House — and Senate. They’ve had it. The swamp ain’t seen nothing yet.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States