Albuquerque Journal

Can the Forest Service reform its abusive culture?

- BY LORENA WILLIAMS Lorena Williams is a contributo­r to Writers on the Range, the opinion service of High Country News (hcn. org). She is a writer and wildland firefighte­r based out of Durango, Colo.

When the Public Broadcasti­ng Service’s NewsHour aired an investigat­ion titled “Rape, Harassment and Retaliatio­n in the U.S. Forest Service” in March, reactions inside the agency ran the gamut. Many managers said they were uncertain about the future of the agency. Others felt they could no longer do their jobs because they feared accusation­s of harassment. Targets of harassment — both women and men — celebrated. For his part, Forest Service Chief Tony Tooke resigned days later, after acknowledg­ing that he was also being investigat­ed for sexual misconduct.

For women like myself, a Forest Service employee and firefighte­r going on 14 seasons, the exposé told me nothing new: Female firefighte­rs have been raped, assaulted and harassed in great numbers for many years, and for the most part, the perpetrato­rs face little or no consequenc­es. It is the victims who are most often retaliated against. After reporting an offense, they are advised to keep the incident(s) quiet, and subsequent­ly are often pushed out of fire crews and even out of the agency altogether.

What the PBS investigat­ion did was shine a light on firefighti­ng culture. Victims, perpetrato­rs, enablers, firstyear rookies, middle managers, forest supervisor­s, regional and national employees — all have found ourselves exposed to the nation, mostly in a compromise­d and ugly position.

“It is such a hostile environmen­t,” said journalist Judy Woodruff, discussing the PBS investigat­ion. “Why do these women go into the Forest Service in the first place?”

I am one of these women and here is my answer: The culture of firefighti­ng is not an inherently “hostile environmen­t.” For every coworker that has excluded me from the “boys’ club,” 10 others have made me feel welcome and safe in a profession­al work environmen­t. I have faith in these good people to change a culture that has historical­ly enabled sexual assault and retaliatio­n. If we do not act as harbingers of change, we are by default complicit in the problem.

The victims interviewe­d for the PBS investigat­ion are just a fraction of those who remain fearfully silent or have moved on from the agency.

I have little doubt of their credibilit­y. I have never been assaulted, fortunatel­y, but I have experience­d and also witnessed harassment and discrimina­tion. In my view, it stems from the perspectiv­e that women are, and should remain, outsiders in the industry.

I was told three years ago during a friendly conversati­on with a male coworker that I was only hired because I was female. It wasn’t true, but it illustrate­d what I fear most about this transition in our field: Women are often seen as intruders, as tokens who were hired only to meet some kind of quota. We are treated as pariahs in our profession­al fields, regarded as little more than sexual harassment cases waiting to happen.

This sentiment — that working with women is playing with fire — has been hinted at by many of my colleagues throughout the years. Male firefighte­rs at all levels feel hamstrung, suddenly censored, in what is a naturally high-risk, adrenaline-filled career that at times warrants aggressive command presence. In expressing their concerns, however, some male firefighte­rs imply that simply maintainin­g an appropriat­e workplace environmen­t is so difficult and out of the ordinary that it cannot possibly be done. And so, they say, they fear for their jobs.

It’s true that certain aspects of this job inherently challenge political correctnes­s. We work in the woods, sleep on the ground, relate to each other through bathroom humor, teasing and goading. Spending an entire summer, day and night, with the same people means that profession­alism inevitably slips into casual camaraderi­e. This is how we cope, how we bond and thrive. This gray area, where our profession­al lives become personal, is both rewarding and dangerous — prime territory for interperso­nal chaos. But firefighte­r culture has to try to enter the 21st century; it can no longer hide fearfully behind patriarcha­l tradition. Times have changed, and fire culture needs to catch up.

Fortunatel­y, change is happening, albeit slowly. For every supervisor like the one who hazed me 17 years ago, dozens since have shown respect and profession­alism. The pressure is now on these good supervisor­s to act as pathfinder­s who will guide us into a new era, rather than behave like rabbits frozen in a spotlight. This is especially true for fire management officers, captains, superinten­dents and other program managers who are the creators of crew culture. They must use their influence to make it clear that women are welcome in the agency and that there is no room for sexual harassment, assault or discrimina­tion.

That said, it is the responsibi­lity of all firefighte­rs to stop enabling problems by ignoring them. If we lead with this ethic in mind, others will follow. It may be hard to do the right thing — to protect those in need and drive out firefighte­rs not worthy of the title — but aren’t we strong enough to handle it?

 ??  ?? Lorena WIlliams
Lorena WIlliams

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States