Albuquerque Journal

Brokaw defenders leave others at NBC uneasy

- BY S.E. CUPP TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY S.E. Cupp is the host of “S.E. Cupp Unfiltered” on HLN. (c) 2018 Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

While our collective attention is still, for God-knows-what reason, on the White House Correspond­ents’ Dinner and Michelle Wolf’s scathing takedown of some of President Trump’s top women officials, another story is quietly slipping under the radar: allegation­s of sexual harassment against one of America’s most powerful and respected television anchors, Tom Brokaw.

A former colleague, Linda Vester, has claimed Brokaw “groped and assaulted” her in the ’90s. An unnamed former assistant has also alleged Brokaw made unwanted advances. Vester has provided journals to Variety that she says back up her account.

Brokaw indignantl­y denied the claim, likening the claims to a “driveby shooting” and dismissing Vester as merely “a former colleague who left NBC News angry that she had failed in her pursuit of stardom.”

“I made no romantic overtures towards her at that time or any other,” he wrote.

But in that same statement, he goes on to contradict himself:

“As I remember, she was at one end of a sofa, I was at the other. It was late and I had been up for 24 hours. As I got up to leave I may have leaned over for a perfunctor­y goodnight kiss, but my memory is that it happened at the door — on the cheek.”

Against the backdrop of our eyeopening national education on sexual harassment, this admission should have been reason enough to approach this story with seriousnes­s and concern. Instead, his colleagues — his female colleagues, mind you — have inexplicab­ly rushed to his defense. Big mistake. Despite their presumed respect for Brokaw, a 22-year “NBC Nightly News” anchor, few of Brokaw’s current colleagues were even at the network 25 years ago when the behavior was alleged to have occurred.

Still fewer were at the NBC News bureau in Denver or London, where at least two incidents reportedly occurred. And presumably none were in Vester’s New York City hotel room, where she says another incident occurred.

And yet, that hasn’t stopped 115 of them, including big names like Rachel Maddow, Mika Brzezinski, Andrea Mitchell and Maria Shriver, from signing a letter attesting to Brokaw’s “tremendous decency and integrity.”

One notable absence? Megyn Kelly, who cautioned on her NBC morning show earlier this week: “You don’t know what you don’t know, and that’s not in any way to impugn Tom, who I love and who’s been so good to me. Just saying, you don’t know what you don’t know.”

Greta Van Susteren and Geraldo Rivera, two Fox News anchors and former Kelly colleagues, learned this the hard way. When Gretchen Carlson alleged harassment against Fox News head Roger Ailes, both were quick to defend him. Van Susteren insisted, “He just doesn’t do this stuff. If this were going on, I would have heard about it.”

Of course, Van Susteren didn’t even work in the New York headquarte­rs where much of Ailes’ harassment took place, later acknowledg­ing she worked “200 miles from the ‘scene of the crimes’” in Washington. Both she and Rivera eventually walked back their defenses.

Since the Brokaw letter was written, a third allegation has emerged, by a former reporter, Mary Reinholz, who claims that in the late ’60s, Brokaw, still then married, abruptly embraced and kissed her while in her mother’s cottage.

Now, it turns out some female staffers at NBC News are complainin­g that they felt pressure to sign the Brokaw letter. One anonymousl­y told the New York Post, “We felt forced to sign the letter supporting Brokaw. We had no choice, particular­ly the lower level staffers.” And, “This was all about coming out in force to protect NBC’s golden boy; the network’s reputation is tied to Brokaw. ... If more women come forward, that’s a big problem.”

Another in that same report said she felt intimidate­d by the powerful names on the letter: “When you have over 100 women like Andrea Mitchell signing a letter of support without knowing the facts, it’s pretty scary . ... The letter will have a chilling effect on other women coming forward.”

The lesson here is, as much as you think you may know someone, you never really know them fully. And unless you were there, you don’t actually know anything about a specific incident or incidents.

Banding together to sign a letter defending a top veteran newsman is exactly the kind of thing that creates a culture of intimidati­on. Who would feel comfortabl­e coming forward about sexual harassment allegation­s now?

Rushing to the defense of an accused sexual harasser is just as bad as rushing to condemn one.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States