Albuquerque Journal

Plan is too dangerous for NM

High-level nuclear waste would be a ticking time bomb

- BY NICHOLAS KING CARLSBAD RESIDENT ROSE GARDNER EUNICE RESIDENT JIMI GADZIA ROSWELL RESIDENT AND GENE HARBAUGH CARLSBAD RESIDENT

We are among the increasing number of people who oppose storing the nation’s deadliest radioactiv­e waste near our communitie­s. We’d like to respond to (the April 18) editorial and to air our concerns about the proposed high-level nuclear waste storage site in our part of the state.

The waste would consist of used fuel rods that have been inside operating nuclear reactors and still contain most of the original uranium, along with plutonium, cesium and strontium. While much of it is degraded within a century, some of the waste materials will remain active for a million years.

Holtec Internatio­nal’s controvers­ial “consolidat­ed interim storage” plan would store up to 100,000 tons of this dangerous waste from all the nuclear generators in the United States for as long as 120 years at a site between Hobbs and Carlsbad.

If Holtec gets its license, the waste will likely stay forever at a near-surface site never designed for longterm disposal. The federal government has failed for decades in efforts to develop an undergroun­d permanent repository for this dangerous radioactiv­e waste, so why should we believe that this waste will ever be removed? Is this not kicking a dirty can down the road for the future generation­s and civilizati­ons to clean up?

Holtec is also a private company that will only be in business for as long as it is profitable. What then? Congress has failed to appropriat­e enough money to clean up many of the existing contaminat­ed sites. What would happen to New Mexico if the federal government breaks its promise to remove this waste later or won’t adequately fund cleanup?

The irradiated fuel rods would be contained in thin steel canisters, later surrounded by cement. These canisters aren’t designed for permanent storage. Metal fatigue, stress cracks or accidents could lead to radioactiv­e leaks, but the applicatio­n doesn’t say how they would repackage damaged canisters.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission set public meetings (last week) in Roswell, Hobbs and Carlsbad and has begun a public comment period. Written comments will be accepted until May 29. Turning out at these hearings and submitting comments are your only opportunit­y to just say no.

Eddy and Lea Counties are the two richest oil and gas producing counties in the country. The industry employs over 8,600 people. Why risk existing jobs for 55 jobs at the waste dump?

The New Mexico dairy industry’s total economic impact exceeds $5 billion annually, second only to oil and gas revenues in state economic impact. The dairy industry employs nearly 6,000 people and generates over 17,000 related jobs. A radioactiv­e release could destroy the dairy, pecan, other agricultur­al and tourism industries in the Pecos Valley in the midst of widespread consumer panic.

We in New Mexico have been burdened with more than our fair share of the nation’s radioactiv­e poisons. This long-lived dangerous waste could threaten existing jobs and economic developmen­t and risk our health today and for generation­s to come. Why do the people who live near this waste want it gone? If it’s so safe, why not leave it where it is? Now is the time to speak up before May 29 and “just say no” to radioactiv­e waste storage.

For more informatio­n see nonuclearw­asteaqui.org.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States