Albuquerque Journal

HOW YOUR CONGRESSIO­NAL DELEGATES VOTED

- By Voterama In Congress © 2018 Thomas Reports Inc.

For the week ending May 25

Contact your legislator­s at the U.S. Capitol Zip codes: House 20515, Senate 20510 Capitol operator: (202) 224-3121

$717 BILLION FOR MILITARY IN 2019: Voting 351 for and 66 against, the House on May 24 authorized a $717 billion military budget (HR 5515) for fiscal 2019, including $69 billion for war-fighting in Afghanista­n, Iraq, Syria and other theaters and $57 billion for active-duty and retiree health care. The bill sets a 2.6 percent pay raise for uniformed personnel; adds a 12th aircraft carrier to the Navy fleet; bars detainee transfers from the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military prison; funds a military parade in Washington requested by President Trump; bans the purchase or use of technology made by the Chinese telecom giant ZTE, which violated U.S. sanctions on North Korea and Iran; prohibits base closures but allows smaller installati­ons to be shuttered if the state’s governor approves; funds programs for military victims of sexual assault and approves tens of billions for convention­al and nuclear weapons while lifting a ban on the developmen­t of lowyield nuclear weapons.

A yes vote was to pass the bill. YES: LUJAN GRISHAM, PEARCE, LUJÁN

DEVELOPING LOW-YIELD NUCLEAR WEAPONS: Voting 188 for and 226 against, the House on May 23 refused to restrict funding in HR 5515 (above) for a low-yield nuclear weapon — the W76-2 warhead — to be mounted on submarine-launched Trident ballistic missiles. Military planners say low-yield, or tactical, warheads are for use in limited conflicts, in contrast to strategic nuclear weapons, which are designed to obliterate targets far from the immediate battlefiel­d. Supporters of developing tactical nuclear weapons say the United States needs to counter Russia’s extensive lowyield arsenal. Critics say the weapons heighten the risk of Armageddon because it is folly to think nuclear war can be waged on a limited basis. The amendment would have withheld half the money authorized for the program pending further studies of its strategic implicatio­ns.

A yes vote was to restrict funding in the 2019 military budget for developing low-yield nuclear weapons.

YES: LUJAN GRISHAM, LUJÁN NOT VOTING: PEARCE BACKGROUND CHECKS ON GUN SALES: Voting 224 for and 191 against, the House on May 24 blocked a Democratic attempt to amend HR 5515 (above) to expand background checks on commercial gun transactio­ns, requiring checks on sales over the Internet and between private parties at gun shows. The measure would plug loopholes that allow an estimated 40 percent of gun sales to avoid mandatory checks via the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System. This was the first congressio­nal vote on gun issues since the May 18 shootings at a Santa Fe, Texas, high school that killed 10 people and wounded 10 others.

A yes vote was in opposition to adding language on background checks to the 2019 military budget.

YES: PEARCE NO: LUJAN GRISHAM NOT VOTING: LUJÁN

CHANGES TO FEDERAL PENAL SYSTEM: Voting 360 for and 59 against, the House on May 22 passed a bipartisan bill (HR 5682) intended to reduce overcrowdi­ng in the 180,000-inmate federal penal system, improve rehabilita­tion and reduce recidivism. In part, the bill would establish individual­ly tailored programs to improve work and educationa­l skills and encourage inmates to earn credits toward early release to halfway houses. Among other provisions, the bill would require inmates to be held within 500 miles of their families and revise standards of care — including a ban on shackling — for incarcerat­ed pregnant women. But opponents complained that the measure would not address statutory rules on mandatory-minimum sentencing, which critics say are responsibl­e for swelling population­s and dysfunctio­n in federal prisons.

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate. YES: LUJAN GRISHAM, LUJÁN NOT VOTING: PEARCE

RELAXATION OF BANKING SAFEGUARDS: Voting 258 for and 159 against, the House on May 22 passed a bipartisan bill (S 2155) that would largely exempt community banks and credit unions from the 2010 DoddFrank financial-oversight law. The measure would also scale back restrictio­ns the law placed on about 15 of the largest banks and 25 medium-sized regional banks, while leaving intact the authority of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to operate as an independen­t agency largely free of congressio­nal oversight.

The bill weakens anti-discrimina­tion rules under which banks report data on lending to minorities, raising from 50 to 500 the number of home loans a bank can issue before becoming subject to the Dodd-Frank reporting requiremen­t. Other provisions would require credit reporting companies to allow consumers to freeze their credit reports free of charge and protect student loan borrowers when a cosigner dies or enters bankruptcy.

A yes vote was to send the bill to President Trump. NO: LUJAN GRISHAM, LUJÁN NOT VOTING: PEARCE DRUGS FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL: The House on May 22 passed, 250 for and 169 against, a bill (S 204) that would give the terminally ill broad access to experiment­al drugs that have not received Food and Drug Administra­tion approval. The bill would grant legal protection to doctors, hospitals and drug firms promoting these unproven treatments, which, to qualify under the bill, must have passed one clinical trial and have a pending applicatio­n at the FDA. Supporters said dying persons deserve access to high-risk interventi­ons as a matter of personal freedom, while opponents said the bill would give false hope to desperate individual­s and weaken long-establishe­d FDA safety procedures.

A yes vote was to pass the bill. NO: LUJAN GRISHAM, LUJÁN NOT VOTING: PEARCE

VETERANS’ ACCESS TO NEARBY HEALTH CARE: Voting 92 for and five against, the Senate on May 23 passed a bill (S 2372) that would upgrade a four-yearold “community care” program in which veterans who live far from Veterans Health Administra­tion facilities or face lengthy waits for treatment can promptly receive publicly funded care from close-to-home providers in the private sector. The bill also would start a process to realign, consolidat­e or close some of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ 1,200-plus medical centers and outpatient clinics. In addition, the bill would raise Medicare reimbursem­ent rates for veterans at rural hospitals and expand financial support to immediate and extended family members who care for veterans.

A yes vote was to send the bill to President Trump. YES: UDALL, HEINRICH

DANA BAIOCCO, CONSUMER PRODUCTS REGULATOR: Voting 50 for and 45 against, the Senate on May 22 confirmed Dana Baiocco, an attorney in private practice, for a seat on the five-member U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. An independen­t agency armed with recall authority, the commission regulates the manufactur­e and safety of thousands of everyday products, with a focus on mechanical, fire, electrical or chemical hazards. Backers said Baiocco’s experience as a product-safety litigator at the Jones Day law firm in Washington qualifies her for the commission. But critics said she has made a career out of defending corporatio­ns including Mattel and Yamaha that have been the subject of enforcemen­t actions by the commission. She declined to provide the Senate with a full list of firms she has represente­d, citing attorney-client privilege.

A yes vote was to confirm the nominee. NO: UDALL, HEINRICH

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States