Albuquerque Journal

EPA lays out next steps for cleanup of Colo. mines

26 sites chosen to reduce wastewater flow, contaminat­ion

- BY DAN ELLIOTT

DENVER — The U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency on Thursday laid out the next steps it will take to clean up wastewater flowing from dozens of old mines in southweste­rn Colorado, including dredging contaminat­ed sediment from streambeds and digging ditches to divert water away from tainted rocks and soil.

The work is part of the EPA’s interim plan to keep toxic heavy metals from flowing into rivers while the agency searches for a permanent solution under the Superfund program.

The interim plan concentrat­es on controllin­g or removing contaminan­ts at 26 sites including campground­s, mine waste piles, ponds and rivers. It will cost about $10 million and take up to five years, the agency said.

Five locations are recreation sites where people could be exposed to arsenic or lead, the EPA said.

The cleanup was prompted by a 2015 wastewater spill at the inactive Gold King mine near Silverton. An EPA-led contractor crew was using heavy equipment to excavate at the mine entrance when it inadverten­tly triggered a blowout of 3 million gallons of wastewater.

Rivers in Colorado, New Mexico and Utah were affected, as were Native American reservatio­ns.

The Gold King is not on the list of 26 sites chosen f because a temporary treatment plant is already in place to clean up wastewater from the mine.

The Superfund cleanup will eventually cover 48 mining sites, but the EPA said it chose 26 for interim work to reduce human and environmen­tal risks.

The EPA said the 26 sites have elevated levels of aluminum, cadmium, copper, iron, lead or zinc.

Two of the recreation sites on the list are campground­s and three are parking areas or locations where people meet for tours, the EPA said.

The plan calls for covering mine waste piles and contaminat­ed soil with gravel or plant growth to reduce human exposure and keep the contaminan­ts from becoming airborne.

The other work includes dredging contaminat­ed sediment from streams and from ponds near mine openings, and digging ditches and berms to keep water from flushing contaminan­ts out of waste piles and into streams.

The EPA is seeking public comment on the plan, with a deadline of July 16.

The 2015 spill released a bright yellow-orange plume laden with arsenic, lead and other toxic metals into rivers. Municipal water suppliers and farmers temporaril­y stopped using the rivers, and some waterways were off-limits to anglers and boaters.

State and local government­s, businesses and homeowners have filed claims totaling more than $2 billion against the EPA for economic and property damage.

 ?? BRENNAN LINSLEY/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Water flows through a series of sediment retention ponds built to reduce heavy metal and chemical contaminan­ts from the Gold King Mine in August 2015.
BRENNAN LINSLEY/ASSOCIATED PRESS Water flows through a series of sediment retention ponds built to reduce heavy metal and chemical contaminan­ts from the Gold King Mine in August 2015.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States