Albuquerque Journal

The Topgolf deal is just a rip-off

We should be spending our scarce incentive dollars to lure high-paying base jobs

- BY ERIC OLIVAS ALBUQUERQU­E RESIDENT

Members of the Albuquerqu­e City Council should (have) opposed the proposed Topgolf funding they (recently approved). Without some fuzzy math and wishful thinking, this deal doesn’t pass the smell test.

An out-of-state, multimilli­on-dollar company stands to benefit from over $4 million in incentives from the county and city. What does this project actually bring to the city? Lowwage, low-skill jobs are the major contributi­on of the project, besides using a vacant piece of land. It will be a positive to develop the old Beach Waterpark site proposed for Topgolf, but given good economic conditions, other developers or possibly Topgolf would likely utilize the site at some time in the future without these outrageous incentives.

With population stagnant, any “new” gross receipts collected by Topgolf will be offset by reductions in collection­s at other local recreation businesses and possibly even cityowned golf facilities. (The estimated) $21,000 per job (pay) is a complete rip-off when considerin­g the fact that most of those to be employed stand to make far less than this annually. If councilors are going to subsidize lowwage jobs, why not spend $1 million a year for 4 years on city positions to hire youth and disadvanta­ged adults to clean streets, parks, etc?

Consider the company Lavu; it is in line for a far smaller pot of incentives from the state and county, but its annual average wage is near $50,000. The Lavu deal costs around $34,130 per job, meaning that this is a true incentive to create high-paying jobs. The Lavu jobs actually contribute to meaningful growth in the economy and bring top talent to Albuquerqu­e. Around $50K a year is enough to buy a home, pay state taxes, eat out at local restaurant­s and support other economic activities that grow the local economy. The sub $20K-a-year jobs at Topgolf will require employees to hold a second job to make ends meet or employees will have to rely on supplement­al government benefits, i.e. Medicaid, food stamps, etc.

The Topgolf deal only recycles money that would be spent here anyway at a great cost to the taxpayers of the city. When every other major city in the region has a similar facility, how does this attraction make Albuquerqu­e a “destinatio­n?”

Young people and skilled profession­als don’t want Topgolf; they want a safe city, with good schools and job opportunit­ies in high-paying, cutting-edge fields. This “build-it and they will come” strategy has led this city wrong at every turn. Let’s start investing in the fundamenta­ls, support local businesses and spend scarce incentive dollars to lure highpaying base economic jobs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States