Albuquerque Journal

States sue over Trump’s proposed mileage rollback

Move would cost drivers more, add to U.S. air pollution

- BY ELLEN KNICKMEYER AND TOM KRISHER

WASHINGTON — Citing safety, the Trump administra­tion on Thursday proposed rolling back car-mileage standards, backing away from years of government efforts to cut Americans’ trips to the gas station and reduce unhealthy, climate-changing tailpipe emissions.

If the proposed rule becomes final, it could roil the auto industry as it prepares for new model years and weaken one of the federal government’s chief weapons against climate change — regulating emissions from cars and other vehicles. The result, opponents say, will be dirtier air, and more pollutionr­elated illness and death.

The proposal itself estimates it could cost tens of thousands of jobs — auto workers who deal with making vehicles more fuel efficient.

The administra­tion also said it wants to revoke an authority granted to California under the half-century-old Clean Air Act to set its own, tougher mileage standards. California and 16 other states already have filed suit to block any change in the fuel efficiency rules.

“The EPA has handed decision-making over to the fossil fuel lobbyists … the flat-Earthers, the climate change deniers,” said Massachuse­tts Attorney General Maura Healey.

The proposal would freeze U.S. mileage standards at levels mandated by the Obama administra­tion for 2020, when the new vehicle fleet will be required to hit an average of 30 miles per gallon in real-world driving.

The proposed change, halting further improvemen­t requiremen­ts, stakes its case on consumer choice and on highway safety claims challenged by many transporta­tion experts.

The administra­tion says waiving requiremen­ts for greater fuel efficiency would make cars and light trucks somewhat more affordable. And that, it said, would get vehicles with the latest technology into the hands of consumers more quickly.

It’s got “everything to do with just trying to turn over the fleet … and get more clean and safe cars on the road,” said Bill Wehrum, assistant administra­tor of the Environmen­tal Protection Agency.

The administra­tion will now seek public comment on its proposal and a range of other options, including leaving the tighter, Obama fuel standards in place.

Some Republican lawmakers supported the mileage freeze, but environmen­tal groups and many states assailed it.

“This has to be absolutely one of the most harmful and dumbest actions that the EPA has taken,” said Healey of Massachuse­tts, one of the attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia objecting to the change. “It’s going to cost drivers here and across the country hundreds of millions of dollars more at the pump.”

The EPA under President Barack Obama had proposed mileage standards that gradually would become tougher, rising to 36 miles per gallon in 2025, 10 mpg higher than the current requiremen­t. California and the automakers agreed to the rules in 2012, setting a single national fuel economy standard.

Soon after taking office, President Donald Trump called for a rollback, urging “common sense changes” if the mileage requiremen­ts threatened auto industry jobs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States