Albuquerque Journal

Endangered species protection­s targeted

- BY MATTHEW BROWN

BILLINGS, Mont. — Galvanized by court rulings protecting grizzly bears and gray wolves, Congressio­nal Republican­s on Wednesday pushed sweeping changes to the Endangered Species Act, despite strong objections from Democrats and wildlife advocates who called the effort a “wildlife extinction package.”

Republican­s began with a vote in the House Natural Resource Committee to strip protection­s from gray wolves across the contiguous U.S.

Courts restored safeguards for wolves in the Great Lakes region in 2014, frustratin­g states that had been allowing hunts to control wolf population­s.

Later Wednesday, lawmakers took up changes to the endangered species law itself, with bills that supporters said would make the law work better and eliminate obstacles to economic progress.

Critics said the measures weaken the law by shifting power away from federal scientists to state and local government­s.

Momentum for change to the 1973 act has been building since President Donald Trump took office. Adding impetus to the effort was a court ruling Monday in Montana that restored protection­s for grizzly bears in and around Yellowston­e National Park, putting on hold planned grizzly hunts in Wyoming and Idaho.

“This ruling in Montana to me is the prime example of why Congress should modernize the Endangered Species Act,” said Senate Environmen­t and Public Works Committee Chairman John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican. “The grizzly bear has been fully recovered for 10 years. Even the Obama administra­tion said so.”

Barrasso said he prefers broad changes to the act rather than legislatio­n on individual species. He has drafted legislatio­n that includes a provision to block courts from intervenin­g in decisions to lift protection­s for five years after those decisions are made. That would have prevented the grizzly ruling if it had been in place.

Other Republican proposals would speed up the process of deciding if species need protection­s, provide conservati­on incentives to landowners, and give state, local and tribal government­s more power in species decisions.

The Wyoming and Idaho hunts would have been the first allowing members of the public with licenses to shoot bears in the contiguous U.S. since the 1990s.

 ?? ALAN ROGERS/THE CASPER STAR-TRIBUNE ?? A court ruling Monday blocking grizzly bear hunts in the U.S. West carries political implicatio­ns amid a push by Congress for sweeping changes to how imperiled species are managed.
ALAN ROGERS/THE CASPER STAR-TRIBUNE A court ruling Monday blocking grizzly bear hunts in the U.S. West carries political implicatio­ns amid a push by Congress for sweeping changes to how imperiled species are managed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States