Albuquerque Journal

2 liberal justices set right tone for latest U.S. Supreme Court

-

Brett Kavanaugh took his seat on the Supreme Court last week in a collegial atmosphere belying the bruising and bitter confirmati­on process that elevated him to the position and left the court and its importance in our system of checks and balances mired in political acrimony. For the sake of the institutio­n, partisans on both sides should heed the words of two justices in describing how the court should move forward.

“We have to rise above partisansh­ip in our personal relationsh­ips,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in a previously scheduled appearance just hours after Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, announced she would support Kavanaugh’s nomination and thereby assured his confirmati­on. “We have to treat each other with respect and dignity, and a sense of amicabilit­y that the rest of the world doesn’t often share.” Collins gave a calm but powerful speech explaining her vote, in essence saying there was simply no corroborat­ing evidence of decades-old sexual misconduct claims that had been leveled against Kavanaugh after his initial confirmati­on testimony had concluded.

Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan — both appointed by President Obama and members of the so-called liberal wing of the court — were speaking at the Princeton University “She Roars” conference and could easily have whipped up a friendly crowd by blasting Kavanaugh.

“It’s just the nine of us,” said Kagan, who had hired Kavanaugh to teach a course at Harvard Law School when she was dean. “We all have a vested interest in having good relations with one another.” Sotomayor spoke of the importance of maintainin­g collegial relationsh­ips on the court even in times of disagreeme­nt. “If you start from the propositio­n that there’s something good in everyone, it’s a lot easier to get along with them.”

The confirmati­on of Kavanaugh was especially bitter for many Democrats, who view him as a reliable conservati­ve vote replacing Justice Anthony Kennedy, who had been viewed as the “swing” vote on the court. Now that middle position is likely to be Chief Justice John Roberts, a generally conservati­ve George W. Bush appointee who — to the chagrin of conservati­ves — cast the key vote upholding Obamacare. It will be up to Roberts, who has a sense of history of the court, to guide it through these difficult times. He has tended to favor a more incrementa­l approach to judging and seeks a broader consensus where possible. And, he seems to understand the role of the chief justice as steward of the federal judiciary.

“He does have a sense of history and how the court will be judged,” said University of Illinois law school dean Vikram Amar. “It may fall on him to be even more of a self-conscious brake on the court than he was before.”

Meanwhile, some Democrats say they will push for further investigat­ion and impeachmen­t of Kavanaugh — a tenuous legal argument at best. And they should keep in mind the immense and possibly permanent damage that kind of fight would do to a court already under fire. A survey of nearly 800 judges who have attended the National Judicial College for training found 90 percent felt judicial independen­ce is threatened.

Kavanaugh didn’t help matters with his intemperat­e criticisms of Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats when he responded to claims of sexual misconduct. He lashed out, accusing them of acting out of anger and seeking revenge for the election of Donald Trump. Kavanaugh, who served 12 years on the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., should have known better. He later acknowledg­ed his remarks were inappropri­ate. They were. But he’s hardly alone. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, another on the court’s liberal wing, publicly attacked Trump on several occasions during the presidenti­al campaign. Like Kavanaugh, she also expressed regret and acknowledg­ed that her comments were inappropri­ate. They were.

We live in divisive times in a divided country. For the sake of this important institutio­n, politician­s and partisans of all stripes should reflect on the importance of the court, consider the Justices Sotomayor and Kagan’s words, take a deep breath and step back.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States