Albuquerque Journal

Hillary Clinton comes out in support of incivility

- RICH LOWRY By the way, none of the people treated this way were Donald Trump, who does so much to create raw feelings with his routinely crude and inflammato­ry rhetoric. The targets were elected officehold­ers who serve in what is still the most distingui

It’s doubtful that a former American presidenti­al candidate has ever formally endorsed incivility before, but Hillary Clinton is ever full of surprises.

In an interview on CNN, the erstwhile advocate of “if they go low, we go high” switched around to unapologet­ically call for going low.

“You cannot be civil with a political party,” she explained, “that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.” She added that if Democrats retake a house of Congress, well, then, “that’s when civility can start again.”

Clinton’s statement is yet more confirmati­on of the radical mood of the current Democratic Party, not just in blessing tactics that once would have been anathema to the mainstream, but questionin­g the legitimacy of core elements of our system. The party’s base is just a few steps from beginning to give up on our common national life.

Civility is a rather fundamenta­l thing to throw under the bus. It is the basis of our political life, assuring that disagreeme­nts are settled within certain bounds and don’t escalate into blood feuds. This doesn’t mean that there can’t be intense arguments, harsh condemnati­ons, passionate controvers­ies and partisan donnybrook­s. These are all endemic to a free society and very healthy things. It does mean that there are certain widely accepted guardrails.

Yet this is now thought to be a sucker’s game from the attorney-provocateu­r Michael Avenatti to the opinion outlets of the center-left. Vox ran a piece that argued, “Civility is not an end on its own if the practices and beliefs it upholds are unjust.”

In the Brett Kavanaugh debate, the normal pressure points of the democratic process — rallies and demonstrat­ions, phone calls to congressio­nal offices, online, print and TV advocacy — were deemed insufficie­nt; senators had to be berated in the hallways, chased out of restaurant­s and harassed at their homes. and floor votes, you aren’t influencin­g the process, but disrupting it.

Our system of government is increasing­ly held in low regard on the left. The 2016 election was somehow stolen, and the mechanism that gave Trump his victory, the Electoral College, is illegitima­te. The Senate, which confirmed Kavanaugh and gives small, red states the same representa­tion as large, blue states, is also illegitima­te. Finally, the Supreme Court, now home to two Trump-appointed justices, is illegitima­te as well. That’s a lot of illegitima­cy, all stemming from one lost presidenti­al election. Imagine if Democrats lose another? The fact is that if you believe an institutio­n is legitimate only if you control it or it works in your favor, you never truly believed in its legitimacy to begin with.

Perhaps the Democratic fever will pass if the party gains some power again, as Clinton suggested in her remarks. But it’s notable enough that one of our major parties is showing signs of contemplat­ing a divorce from our system as it currently exists.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States