Albuquerque Journal

One more Dem to consider in 2020: Jimmy Carter?

- BY ROB MONTZ TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE

Twenty candidates lined up recently for the first televised debates of the 2020 election. The roster is maxed out, with senators, governors, mayors and tech entreprene­urs all vying for the chance to take down President Donald Trump.

There is indeed one Democrat who’s perfectly positioned to do just that. He boasts that elusive mix of progressiv­e bona fides, mainstream appeal and proven policy track record. But he wasn’t on the stage. It’s Jimmy Carter, of course. That’s not entirely a joke. The public perception of Carter is that he’s a one-term loser crushed by the weight of his own naive incompeten­ce. Supposedly just a simple peanut farmer chewed up by Washington, Carter has gone down in history as the poster boy for failed Democratic administra­tions.

That’s a mistake. Carter actually boasts one of the most impressive presidenti­al policy records of the modern era, a set of accomplish­ments with broad bipartisan appeal that laid the groundwork for decades of prosperity. The yawning gap between the perception and reality of his administra­tion is the product of our warped relationsh­ip with the presidency, the grotesque expectatio­ns the public imposes on this office.

Ronald Reagan is lionized as the great deregulato­r, but some of the most important deregulati­ons of the past half-century were actually initiated by Carter. This wasn’t mindless slashing; it was targeted, common sense reform unleashing competitio­n in parts of the economy long dominated by artificial monopolies.

We see the fruits of Carter’s labors all around us. A trillion-dollar natural gas boom, cheap

air travel, countless microbrews, a vast rail and freight infrastruc­ture — these are the direct products of Carter-signed regulatory reforms.

Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon all abused American intelligen­ce agencies to undermine political opponents; Carter championed new oversight of government wiretappin­g. And in an act of exceptiona­l political self-sacrifice, he backed punishing policies to tame inflation. That produced immense short-term economic pain, but laid the monetary foundation­s for the Reagan-era boom.

Carter also did plenty to please progressiv­es, including creating two new Cabinet agencies. But unlike, say, President Barack Obama, who proudly accepted the Nobel Peace Prize his first year in office and then spent the rest of his term issuing executive orders to kill distant foreigners, Carter was genuinely committed to peace, distinguis­hing himself as the only modern president not to be at war during any part of his term.

So why don’t you know any of this? Why have you been taught that Carter’s administra­tion was a failure?

Because, of course, it’s not enough for presidents to simply govern competentl­y. The public demands much more than that.

Over the past century, the presidency has steadily gathered a grotesque messianic mystique. The man in the Oval Office is not just another public servant; he’s the allpowerfu­l father figure, the redeemer of the national soul, the messianic CEO of the economy.

And Carter didn’t fit the role. This is a man who actually read complaints about his presidency live on national television — and who, at the white-hot peak of stagflatio­n, famously told Americans “to sacrifice your comfort and your ease.”

Carter also intentiona­lly rejected the monarchica­l trappings of the office: walking alongside the presidenti­al limo in his inaugural parade; carrying his own garment bag off Air Force One; selling the presidenti­al yacht; ordering the Marine Corps band to stop playing “Hail to the Chief” whenever he entered a room. As he later explained: “People want a royal family in the White House. I wasn’t inclined to give them that.”

This approach rendered him helpless when the media machine turned on him. Whether it was the Iran hostage crisis, long gas lines or the “killer rabbit” episode — a flagrant fabricatio­n claiming Carter had been attacked by a wild bayou bunny — scandals metastasiz­ed and served as confirmati­on of his fecklessne­ss.

Of course, most of Carter’s presidenti­al peers fully embraced the cult-like features of the office, seeing nothing wrong with making the president the center of American politics and fully exploiting the public’s appetite for a messianic hero. The modest position originally conceived by the Founders has been transforme­d into the warmaking, news-dominating, flatly unconstitu­tional monstrosit­y of today.

President Jimmy Carter is exactly what America needs right now. His was a presidency defined by competentl­y administer­ed bipartisan solutions and an unpreceden­ted effort to scale back the prominence of the office. He’d be the perfect antidote to Trump.

“Carter 2020: Boring Pragmatism You Can Trust.” OK, yes, they’d be nominating a man so old he makes Bernie Sanders seem youthful — and who probably prefers to spend the rest of his days teaching Sunday school. But, please, dream with me.

He is still eligible for one more term.

 ??  ?? Jimmy Carter
Jimmy Carter

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States