Albuquerque Journal

Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson shine in “The Lighthouse”

Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson shine in ‘The Lighthouse’

- BY LINDSEY BAHR

Enter “The Lighthouse “at your own risk.

This is a stark, moody, surreal and prolonged descent into seaside madness that will surely not be for everyone. But those who do choose to go on this black-and-white journey with Robert Pattinson and Willem Dafoe will ultimately find it a rewarding one, even if the blaring foghorn rings in your ears for days to come. Director Robert Eggers has made something truly visionary — stripped-down and out of time — that asks the viewer to simply submit to his distinctiv­e, strange, funny and haunting tale of a pair of “wickies” in 1890 New England tasked with keeping the lighthouse running.

Pattinson and Dafoe make for inspired casting choices for this twohander, with Pattinson as the rookie, Winslow, a former timber man who was looking for a different life, and Dafoe as the graying veteran, Wake, who is determined to keep things in order. Winslow is not exactly an eager student or subordinat­e. He wants the lighthouse to be his as soon as he gets to the island. He does not have a seafarer’s attention to detail and is ill-equipped to handle the endless drudgery of keeping the house tidy and shoveling rocks back and forth across

the island. Also, he’s been having some increasing­ly demonic and disturbing dreams, has made an enemy of a taunting sea bird and has to deal with Wake’s constant badgering and flatulence (seriously).

But Wake knows that there’s a reason for their backbreaki­ng work, seemingly unnecessar­y chores and ancient superstiti­ons (“It’s bad luck to kill a sea bird,” he tells Winslow, advising him to stop quarreling with his winged tormentor). Boredom, he says later, makes men turn to villains. All they have are their tasks to keep them from going mad. Naturally, madness finds them anyway. The film becomes a kind of phantasmag­oria as you are left wondering what’s real, what’s imagined and whether or not that even matters.

Eggers, who broke out with the terribly creepy “The Witch,” continues to prove his unique ability to transport an audience to a different time. He relishes in the language of the era and gives both his stars deliciousl­y odd monologues to chew on and spurt out. The dialogue may be minimal — in fact, it takes more than a few minutes for the first word to be uttered — but that bare-bones approach makes what is said even more impactful.

“The Lighthouse” is a triumph of mood and vision, like the love child of Andrei Tarkovsky and David Lynch that knows that its actors are just a small piece of the overall compositio­n. The sounds of the sea, the waves crashing violently against the rocks, the birds, that cursed foghorn and the looming eye of the lighthouse are all equal co-stars. That’s not to diminish the joy of the acting, however. Pattinson and Dafoe have a wonderfull­y complex relationsh­ip that at times even borders on that of a bickering married couple whose passion is long gone.

If there is a complaint to be made, it is simply that “The Lighthouse” doesn’t exactly justify its nearly two-hour runtime. Although the images and actors remain transfixin­g, the experiment­al approach starts to wear thin after about 60 minutes. After 90, it’s downright mindnumbin­g and repetitive. That’s not to say that it is not worth it. In fact, this is a movie that demands to be consumed distractio­nfree. But by the end, you might find yourself feeling as crazy and untethered as the wickies.

 ??  ??
 ?? COURTESY OF A24 FILMS ?? Willem Dafoe, left, and Robert Pattinson in a scene from “The Lighthouse.”
COURTESY OF A24 FILMS Willem Dafoe, left, and Robert Pattinson in a scene from “The Lighthouse.”
 ?? COURTESY OF A24 FILMS ?? Robert Pattinson in a scene from “The Lighthouse.”
COURTESY OF A24 FILMS Robert Pattinson in a scene from “The Lighthouse.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States