Albuquerque Journal

Judge: New pipelines must be reviewed

Army Corps program blocked last month has been revised

- BY MATTHEW BROWN ASSOCIATED PRESS

BILLINGS, Mont. — A U.S. judge on Monday revised a recent court ruling that threatened to hold up thousands of utility projects crossing streams and wetlands, but left in place a requiremen­t for new oil and gas pipelines to undergo further environmen­tal review.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Brian Morris means the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can again use a disputed permitting program to approve electrical lines and other utility work through streams and wetlands. Maintenanc­e and repair work on existing pipelines also would be allowed, but not constructi­on of new pipelines.

Attorney Jared Margolis with the Center for Biological Diversity said, “Constructi­ng pipelines through rivers, streams and wetlands without analyzing the impacts … is unconscion­able.”

The Army Corps program, or Nationwide Permit 12, was blocked by Morris last month. In a lawsuit over the Keystone XL pipeline, the judge sided with environmen­talists who argued companies were using the program to skirt water protection laws and ignore the cumulative harm from thousands of stream and wetlands crossings.

Attorneys for utility industries and the government said Morris’ original ruling hampered thousands of constructi­on projects across the U.S. In response, Morris agreed to limit the scope of his ruling. He said the Army Corps “committed a serious error” in failing to adequately consult with wildlife agencies before reauthoriz­ing the permitting program in 2017.

The Army Corps has broad jurisdicti­on over U.S. waterways and uses the permit to approve qualifying pipelines and other utility projects after minimal environmen­tal review.

Since Nationwide Permit 12 was renewed three years ago it has been used about 38,000 times, according to federal officials.

Industry supporters describe the program as crucial for timely decisions on projects. Analyzing each crossing would be costly and is unnecessar­y because most involve little disturbanc­e of land or water, they said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States