Albuquerque Journal

The NFL is on the brink of a disaster

- VICTOR DAVIS HANSON Email author@victorhans­on.com.

The National Football League celebrated its 100th anniversar­y last year. This should be a time of self-congratula­tion for the brutal sport, which has no similar counterpar­t outside the United States.

The NFL’s megaprofit­s dwarf those of other profession­al sports in the U.S. The Super Bowl, not the World Series, is America’s national sports event.

The league survived all sorts of crises in the past. It was one of the first profession­al sports to integrate its teams, doing so in the 1920s. But the integratio­n unfortunat­ely ceased, and the NFL didn’t reintegrat­e until the mid-’40s, becoming one of the last sports leagues to embrace fully a racially blind meritocrac­y.

The NFL successful­ly absorbed the rival American Football league in 1966. So far the NFL has avoided federal safety regulation­s that could curb the incidence of physical trauma inherent in the sport. The league’s owners are a cross-section of America’s most successful entreprene­urs and old-money families — many of them politicall­y well-connected. Yet the NFL is in trouble like never before. In 2016, San Francisco 49ers quarterbac­k Colin Kaepernick refused to stand for the national anthem. He claimed he was protesting the treatment of African Americans.

Kaepernick was an odd revolution­ary. His mother is white, his father is an African American of Ghanaian-Nigerian ancestry, and he was raised by a middle-class white couple. Kaepernick’s only prior controvers­y was being accused by another player of using the N-word. He denied it but was still fined by the league.

Kaepernick’s rejection of “The Star-Spangled Banner” eventually spread throughout the NFL. Even though he was a backup quarterbac­k, Kaepernick became a resistance idol. Soon he was a corporate ad man, pitching Nike sneakers.

Then game attendance fell. So did television viewership. Apparently, lots of fans had no desire to spend their Sundays watching 20-something multimilli­onaires lecture them the American flag was not worth honoring.

In 2018, the league belatedly banned players from kneeling for the national anthem. By then, Kaepernick had left football and become a megaphone for more corporate sponsors.

Now the NFL is in the news amid national protests and violence following the killing of George Floyd at the hands of police.

The inspiratio­nal song “Lift Every Voice and Sing” — also known as the Black national anthem — will be played before every game of the first week of the season. The league is considerin­g letting players wear protest insignia on their helmets or jerseys. NFL Commission­er Roger Goodell apologized to players for not listening to them about racism.

Yet the NFL capitulati­on poses fundamenta­l problems for the league. It has now essentiall­y green-lighted the sort of activism that in the last few years has been eating away its profits.

Racial issues are often virtue-signaled in the NFL —but almost never in an honest way. New Orleans Saints quarterbac­k Drew Brees recently objected to players not honoring the flag. But he quickly caved when a media mob damned him. In contrast, Philadelph­ia Eagles wide receiver DeSean Jackson posted a series of anti-Semitic tweets this month, even falsely attributin­g a quote to Hitler. The disconnect posed a question for the NFL: Is it worse to be pro-American flag or anti-Semitic?

NFL owners and head coaches are almost all white. But nearly three-quarters of the players are black. Those who play the game obviously want to see more diversity in coaching and ownership.

In a culture so obsessed with identity politics, is it the players or the owners and coaches — or both — who do not “look like America?”

Given about 13% of the U.S. population is Black, and given the Black Lives Matter movement embraces concepts like proportion­al representa­tion, today’s NFL teams hardly qualify as diverse. Social activists might argue that the league should mentor and recruit more Latinos, Asian Americans and Native Americans to better reflect their percentage­s of our diverse national population.

Perhaps an NFL compromise could ensure that 30% of coaches and owners are nonwhite, thus reflecting current U.S. demography. But then, in reciprocit­y, the players would match such mandatory demographi­c diversity — leading to Native Americans, Latinos, Asians, whites and those of mixed ancestry accounting for 87% of the player population. The NBA might also take note.

This progressiv­e model of proportion­al representa­tion could also apply to overrepres­ented white athletes in hockey, tennis, golf and swimming — sports faulted by identity politics groups as being unfairly overrepres­ented by whites. Obviously, such racial gerrymande­ring will not happen because fans value meritocrac­y over ethnic affiliatio­ns. Or at least they did.

If the multibilli­on-dollar NFL decides that multimilli­onaire players have no obligation to stand to honor a collective national anthem, and that there will be separate anthems and politicize­d uniforms, then millions of Americans will quietly shrug and change the channel.

And that silent protest will make the 2016-17 anthem protest look like child’s play.

 ??  ?? Columnist
Columnist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States