Albuquerque Journal

Trump gambit drives Tehran into China’s nuclear arms

- BY IVO DAALDER

In May 2018, President Donald Trump announced his decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal because it was “defective at its core.” But if Tehran were willing to negotiate a better agreement, he would be “ready, willing and able” to join them.

This month, Iran announced it was ready for a new deal. Unfortunat­ely, that deal would be with China, rather than the United States. And instead of curtailing Iran’s nuclear capabiliti­es, the new agreement would establish a far-reaching economic and security partnershi­p between the two nations.

The new China-Iran partnershi­p represents a massive failure of the administra­tion’s Iran policy. Far from forcing Tehran back to the table, the administra­tion’s new policy has driven Iran into the hands of the Chinese. That clearly wasn’t the intent when Trump appeared in the Diplomatic Reception Room at the White House two years ago to denounce his predecesso­r’s negotiatin­g skills and Iran’s destructiv­e behavior. The hope, instead, was massive new economic sanctions would force Tehran to agree to a better deal or lead the Iranian people to rise up against the regime.

Those aims were underscore­d by Mike Pompeo in his first speech as secretary of state just days after Trump’s announceme­nt. Pompeo listed 12 demands that Tehran would have to meet in a new agreement and for “the strongest sanctions in history” to be lifted. They included a ban on any nuclear enrichment, “unqualifie­d access” to weapons inspectors, ending its ballistic missile program, halting all destabiliz­ing activities in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and other parts of the region and more.

The list was long, and it was difficult to see how any Iranian government would accede to all demands in a single deal. But that was the point. Few in the administra­tion believed the Tehran regime would ever agree to sign on the dotted line. Instead, they hoped that the economic strangulat­ion would undermine the regime and lead to its ultimate collapse.

There were two problems with that strategy. First, the administra­tion rejected the pleas from Britain, France and Germany — who, along with Russia and China, were also party to the original deal — to try and improve the agreement’s terms together. Indeed, in the months before Trump announced his decision to withdraw, the three European countries worked with U.S. officials to strengthen key aspects of the deal. They were close to an agreement when Trump decided to walk away.

The decision to go it alone, however, reduced the chances that the new U.S. policy would succeed. While Washington withdrew from the deal, all of the others remained within it. None followed it in imposing sanctions, thus limiting the impact of the U.S. effort to isolate Tehran.

Second, far from joining in, the Europeans and other parties sought to undermine the new U.S. efforts. The Europeans set up a barter exchange to enable their companies to escape retaliator­y U.S. sanctions for continuing to trade with and invest in Iran. Russia increased its military and strategic engagement with Iran. And China set out to forge an entirely new partnershi­p with Tehran in order to drasticall­y increase its power, presence and influence throughout the Gulf region.

That partnershi­p is now being consummate­d. Under the final version of the agreement, which was leaked to The New York Times, Chinese investment­s in banking, telecommun­ications, ports and many other areas would increase dramatical­ly, amounting to some $400 billion over the next quarter-century. In return, Iran would supply China with oil for 25 years at a discount.

Beyond economic engagement, the partnershi­p would extend to military and strategic areas, including joint training and exercises, joint weapons research and intelligen­ce sharing.

... None of this was inevitable. Had Trump decided to continue working with the Europeans on strengthen­ing the original deal, Iran would likely have rebuffed Beijing’s advances . ...

Trump decided otherwise, forgetting the geopolitic­al edict, borrowed from “The Godfather,” that it’s always best to keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States