Albuquerque Journal

States to require jobless on benefits to seek work

Many employers are crying out for workers and not finding any

- BY WILSON RING

STOWE, Vt. — Eduardo Rovetto is hoping the state of Vermont’s reinstated requiremen­t that people collecting unemployme­nt benefits must seek work to qualify will help him hire enough staff for his restaurant in the resort town of Stowe.

After more than a year of coronaviru­s restrictio­ns on his business, Piecasso Pizzeria & Lounge, he is expecting a breakout summer tourism season. But, like employers across the country, he’s worried he won’t have enough workers.

“We’ve been getting many excuses as to why not to return,” said Rovetto, who is offering a signing bonus of up to $600 to try and add 15-20 employees who agree to stay through the middle of October.

Many employers are telling similar stories. Fourteen months after COVID-19 put hundreds of thousands out of work, the U.S. economy is rebounding and employers are desperate for workers.

The challenge was highlighte­d Friday when employers nationwide added 266,000 jobs, far fewer than expected, and businesses reported they couldn’t find people to fill the openings they have to keep up with the rapidly strengthen­ing economic rebound.

To encourage people to return to work, more states are making it harder for people to stay on unemployme­nt. Many blame the easy benefits that followed the pandemic, including what is now a $300-a-week supplement­al federal payment on top of state benefits. The argument is that people make more money staying home than going back to work.

Several states have begun requiring those receiving unemployme­nt benefits to show they are actively searching for work, and a few will stop providing the additional federal supplement.

It’s not just the hospitalit­y sector scrambling to fill positions. Alene Candles in Milford, New Hampshire, is looking to fill 1,500 positions for its facility there and another in New Albany, Ohio, to meet demand for the holiday season. Company representa­tives will be participat­ing in a number of virtual job fairs this month.

“We have had more than 100 positions open since the start of the year and just recently increased sign-on bonuses to $1,200 for hourly positions, in part because we are competing with an entity that can print its own money — the federal government — and its $300-per-week additional unemployme­nt benefit,” said CEO Rod Harl. “I would love to welcome those searching for work to join our team.”

On Monday, the state of New Hampshire reopened its job centers for the first time since the pandemic hit to help people looking for work, but only a handful showed up.

Labor experts say the shortage is not just about the $300 payment. Some unemployed people also have been reluctant to look for work because they fear catching the virus. Others have found new occupation­s rather than return to their old jobs. And many women, especially working mothers, have had to leave the workforce to care for children.

The details and the timing of the stateled efforts to get people back to work differ, but they are coming from states led by both Republican­s and Democrats.

In addition to Vermont, states reinstatin­g the work-search requiremen­t include Arizona, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvan­ia, Rhode Island and South Carolina.

“As President Reagan said, the best social program is a job,” Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, said when announcing the resumption of the work-search requiremen­t. “This statement rings true today. Unemployme­nt benefits are still available to Arizonans who need them, but now that plenty of jobs are available, those receiving the benefits should be actively looking for work.”

Arkansas, Mississipp­i, Montana and South Carolina are planning to stop accepting the $300 benefit.

In announcing last week that unemployed workers will no longer receive the additional benefit beginning June 27, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte, a Republican, said it was “doing more harm than good.”

Rachel Mata, an area manager for a Fayettevil­le, North Carolina-based staffing company, said it’s been increasing­ly difficult to find people for positions since the passage of the latest federal COVID-19 relief bill.

“We get candidates who will mention, ‘Hey, you know, why would I go to work when I get paid more on unemployme­nt to sit at home?’” said Mata.

At a recent job fair, only one candidate showed up, said Mata, whose company, Mega Force Staffing Group Inc., focuses on manufactur­ing jobs. In other cases, candidates have gone through the company’s onboarding process, but did not show up on their start date.

In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, the heart of the state’s $20 billion tourism industry, restaurant­s and resorts are scrambling for summer help. Angelo Verdone, an assistant general manager at Seaside Resorts, said hotels are so short-staffed that managers are cleaning rooms and doing maintenanc­e. He is working some front desk shifts.

William Spriggs, an economist at Howard University and chief economist for the AFL-CIO, said the issue isn’t as simple as the unemployed being able to receive more benefits. He says the economy has changed.

He said he doesn’t think the job-search requiremen­t is bad, but it won’t solve the labor shortage.

“Matching workers to employers isn’t as easy as people think, (as) … some of these employers are finding out,” Spriggs said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States