Albuquerque Journal

GOP cannabis bill to propose lower taxes and state control

Measure expected to have better chances than Dem proposal

- BY TIFFANY KARY

A Republican bill to legalize marijuana at the federal level in the Unites States, expected to be unveiled soon, would have a lighter regulatory touch, lower taxes and fewer provisions to help minorities compared with prior legislativ­e efforts, two people who have seen the draft legislatio­n said.

Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., has been reported to be leading the draft. Mace, who has declined to comment when asked about the initiative, has a news conference scheduled for Monday about the proposal. Her legislatio­n follows a bill from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the Cannabis Administra­tion & Opportunit­y Act, which hasn’t gained traction.

Those who have seen Mace’s draft say it would regulate cannabis much like alcohol. This would be a lighter touch than the more rigorous oversight called for in Schumer’s bill, which critics said would make pot akin to pharmaceut­ical drugs or tobacco by putting the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion in charge of overseeing health and safety issues. The draft, which was also seen by Bloomberg News, has not been completed, and some details still could change.

“It would largely delegate regulatory powers to the existing state government­s,” said Brady Cobb, a board member of Captor Capital, an Irvine, California-based operator of dispensari­es, who saw the draft. Cobb, the former CEO of Bluma Wellness, is also a lobbyist in Washington pushing for cannabis reform.

Mace’s proposed excise tax is 3.75%, according to Cobb — a fraction of the 25.5% Schumer’s legislatio­n would put on marijuana products. Detractors have said the higher tax would make legal cannabis too expensive to compete with products sold on the illicit market and cause problems like those seen in California. There, a socalled legacy market persists alongside licensed and taxed marijuana.

Mace’s bill would let state government­s regulate the health and safety of cannabis products and put the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau — an agency under the Department of the Treasury that collects excise taxes — in charge of federal regulation instead of the FDA.

“The FDA would have had the ability to come in and slow things down,” said Cobb, who said he sees Mace’s legislatio­n as a tighter bill. He added it’s “a common-sense middle ground” between Schumer’s measure, which he called “very aspiration­al,” and a more conservati­ve previous effort that would have basically left legalizati­on

up to individual states.

That measure is more likely to result in smaller, craft-style brands. That’s because oversight by the FDA could leave power concentrat­ed with bigger companies that could afford to deal with more layers of regulatory compliance.

The other major difference with Schumer’s proposal is that Mace’s is lighter on so-called socialequi­ty provisions, which are meant to repair harm from the war on drugs by promoting minority participat­ion. Mace’s legislatio­n lacks a fund that would be designed to financiall­y support minorities like the one in Schumer’s proposal.

Cobb said the bill’s logic is that most of the drug arrests were done at the state level. It does offer the opportunit­y for nonviolent offenders to reenter society.

Marijuana stocks, which had been beaten down this year largely due to the industry’s stalled political prospects, have rallied all week on anticipati­on of Mace’s legislatio­n. Because Republican­s have largely been the strongest holdouts in the Senate, investors see Mace’s bill as having the potential to make quicker headway.

 ?? SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT/ VIA AP ?? Authoritie­s raided this illegal marijuana grow in an unincorpor­ated area of Valley Center northeast of San Diego County in June, seizing 15,000 plants.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT/ VIA AP Authoritie­s raided this illegal marijuana grow in an unincorpor­ated area of Valley Center northeast of San Diego County in June, seizing 15,000 plants.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States