Albuquerque Journal

Biden hunkers down for a long, limited war in Ukraine

- DAVID IGNATIUS

WASHINGTON — “Limited war requires limits,” wrote Harvard professor Thomas Schelling in his 1960 classic, “The Strategy of Conflict.” President Joe Biden took some sensible steps last week in defining the West’s goals for the war in Ukraine — and its limits.

Biden summarized his administra­tion’s approach in an op-ed Wednesday in the New York Times. In place of loose talk about total military victory over Russian invaders, he said the United States’ goal was a negotiated peace — and wisely put this objective in the words of America’s ally: “As President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine has said, ultimately this war ‘will only definitive­ly end through diplomacy.’ “

To check recent Russian advances in eastern Ukraine, Biden is sending a powerful rocket artillery system known as Himars, which can attack Russian targets with the devastatin­g impact of a precision airstrike. But he clarified the purpose of these U.S. weapons was not only to help Ukraine on the battlefiel­d but also achieve “the strongest possible position at the negotiatin­g table.”

Biden had a very specific set of messages for Russian President Vladimir Putin: “We do not seek a war between NATO and Russia. As much as I disagree with Mr. Putin, and find his actions an outrage, the United States will not try to bring about his ouster in Moscow . ... We do not want to prolong the war just to inflict pain on Russia.” As for the Himars missiles, Biden made clear “we are not encouragin­g or enabling Ukraine to strike beyond its borders.”

These messages, reinforced in background briefings last week by senior administra­tion officials, signal a change of tone in the Washington debate about the war. An easy triumphali­sm developed after Russia’s reversals in the first month of the war. Putin and his inept commanders had blundered; brave Ukrainian forces were pushing back the invaders toward the Russian border; Zelensky talked — though he probably knew better — as if total military victory were possible.

On Thursday, however, Zelensky offered a chilling summary of Russia’s advances since it concentrat­ed its forces in the eastern region known as Donbas and began raining down rocket and artillery fire along what Zelensky described as a 600-mile front. “The Russian army has already destroyed almost the entire Donbas,” Zelensky said in a video speech to the Luxembourg parliament. “As of today, about 20% of our territory is under the control of the occupiers.”

The Biden White House has been reckoning with the new success of Russia’s meat-grinder tactics for the past week. This has been Biden’s testing hour as a wartime leader; he had reaped well-deserved praise for mobilizing the coalition to arm Ukraine and check Russia’s invasion; now comes the time of reversal in battle and presidenti­al anxiety.

Biden’s most urgent task has been to check a panicked rush for peace among some European allies who worry about the costs of a protracted conflict. European leaders seemed to steady themselves this week by committing to an embargo of Russian seaborne oil deliveries while Germany agreed to provide Ukraine powerful antiaircra­ft defenses and tanks.

The war in Ukraine, with its vicious swings in momentum, might be moving from ebullient optimism about Ukraine’s defiance toward a phase that’s closer to the long, enervating grind of the Korean War . ...

Biden rightly insists only Ukrainians, who have fought and died so bravely, can decide how this war should end. But last week, he expanded what the strategist Schelling called “implicit bargaining” with Russia by marking the contours of the war. At some point, after the butcher’s bill is paid, we’ll move into explicit negotiatio­ns to resolve this terrible conflict.

 ?? SCyonludmi­cantisetd Columnist ??
SCyonludmi­cantisetd Columnist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States