Albuquerque Journal

Another Air Force water mess, another slow cleanup in NM

-

It took years for the Air Force and Department of Defense to take responsibi­lity for the decades-old leak in an aviation fuel pipeline at Kirtland Air Force Base. Signs of the leak were first discovered in 1992, but KAFB didn’t attempt to track the source until 1999, and only after the New Mexico Environmen­t Department under then-Gov. Susana Martinez demanded an investigat­ion.

And in the ensuing years pressure from the state’s congressio­nal delegation, including now-retired Sen. Tom Udall, Sen. Martin Heinrich and then-Rep. now-Gov. Michele Lujan Grisham, has kept the cleanup on track.

The Air Force has since spent $125 million and treated 1.16 billion gallons of groundwate­r for contaminan­ts. Last summer state Environmen­t Department officials said the end of the massive cleanup may be in sight. Little wonder another Air Force cleanup in the state is moving at a glacial pace — even though the source of contaminat­ion isn’t in dispute.

Toxic “forever chemicals” from firefighti­ng foam used in training exercises at Cannon Air Force Base near Clovis leaked off-base into the groundwate­r beneath a nearby dairy farm. Base officials asked Art Schapp, owner of Highland Dairy, to test his water in 2018; so began his long nightmare.

The perfluoroa­lkyl and polyfluoro­alkyl substances, PFAS, can cause certain types of cancers, high cholestero­l and low birth weights and can accumulate in the bloodstrea­m. They were common in non-stick and waterproof­ing products.

Soon after the Air Force notified Schaap of the contaminat­ion, state and federal agencies said the dairy’s cow milk and meat had to be taken off the market because PFAS levels in the animals exceeded health advisories. After spending millions of dollars feeding animals that eventually died, Schapp had to euthanize what remained of his herd: more than 3,600 cows. State estimates put the farm’s revenue losses and increased expenses at more than $5.9 million.

New Mexico is suing the Department of Defense over the pollution, but litigation has stalled with other PFAs suits.

The Environmen­t Department says the contaminat­ion at Cannon and Holloman Air Force bases poses an “imminent and substantia­l endangerme­nt to human health and the environmen­t.” Environmen­t Secretary Jim Kenney says the state and farmers navigate the cleanup, “from the science and technical modeling of the PFAS plume moving through Clovis, to evaluating how to remediate it, to testing people’s water, public and private water supplies, to educating the community around PFAS exposures.”

The Department of Defense “caused the contaminat­ion, the pollution, the poisoning of this herd,” Kenney says. “They have legal responsibi­lity, if not legal certainly ethical, to assist or pay for (Schaap’s) expenses.”

Yet the Air Force maintains that current federal regulation­s restrict DoD from addressing anything other than human water consumptio­n concerns. It’s moving forward with a $16.6 million project to test treatment of the contaminat­ion plume. But the Air Force could not assist Schaap with the $200K cost of installing a filter on the livestock water supply. Nor has it chipped in for dead cow disposal. (NMED allocated $850,000 from an emergency fund. U.S. Department of Agricultur­e helped under a program that offers monthly payments for producers who have removed milk from the market because of chemical contaminat­ion.)

Schaap commends state agencies and U.S. lawmakers for helping his business through a yearslong crisis but says dealing with the military is “like talking to a brick wall.”

This is bureaucrac­y at its worst. DoD has known for decades firefighti­ng foams with PFAS were dangerous. And we’ve long expressed gratitude for the economic impact the state’s military installati­ons have — Cannon alone employs hundreds of civilians, thousands of military personnel and has an annual impact in the neighborho­od of $680 million.

But feel-good economic data is quickly set aside when the federal government doesn’t live up to a good-neighbor standard. DoD must dispel the label Newsweek gave it in 2014 as “one of the world’s biggest polluters.” It can start by helping compensate Schaap and others for losses incurred by contaminat­ion from its PFAS-laden firefighti­ng foam.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States