Albuquerque Journal

Today’s inflation could end unlimited federal government

- BY ANTONY DAVIES ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS, DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY; FOR INSIDESOUR­CES. COM

Consumer prices are up almost 9% from where they were a year ago. For the median household, that’s equivalent to a $6,000 pay cut. Politician­s have blamed corporate greed, the Ukraine war and the supply chain because they are keen to get voters to latch on to any explanatio­n so long as it isn’t the correct explanatio­n. The correct explanatio­n lies with the politician­s themselves.

For four decades, economists warned the government should stop spending money it doesn’t have. But deficit spending was needed, politician­s told us, to deal with the Soviet threat in the 1980s, then the Savings and Loan crisis in the 1990s, then 9/11 in the 2000s, then the housing crisis in the 2010s, then COVID in the 2020s. Generation­s of politician­s ignored the consequenc­es, kicking the can down the road for future generation­s of taxpayers to pay.

We are that future generation, and today’s inflation is one of the consequenc­es.

The federal government collects, from all taxes combined, around $4 trillion per year. But it owes $30 trillion, and has committed to paying at least an additional $100 trillion it won’t have to future retirees. For perspectiv­e, that’s like a household with a $60,000 income being $450,000 in debt and then promising to pay for 18 kids to attend fouryear private colleges.

Despite all this borrowing, inflation has been tame for a very long time. What changed is that the debt has become so large that the government has run out of places to borrow more. Until recently, the largest lender was the Social Security trust fund. Until 2010, Social Security generated a surplus and lent that surplus to the government. But around 2010, the surplus dried up. Since then, not only has Social Security had nothing to lend, it’s been needing back money it previously lent.

As the government has needed to borrow more and more, the Federal Reserve has had to take up the slack. But, unlike any other lender, when the Fed lends, the money supply grows. And when the money supply grows faster than the economy, we get inflation. What went wrong is we allowed the limited federal government the Founders created to escape its limits. First, politician­s discovered they could win elections by paying off voters with other people’s money. And so modern elections have become contests in which politician­s vie with each other to give “free” stuff to their constituen­ts while passing on the bill to other politician­s’ constituen­ts.

Second, the Supreme Court decided to “rewrite” the Constituti­on by reading all manner of things into the document that the plain words on the page didn’t say. This began with Social Security. Politician­s and voters wanted Social Security, yet nowhere in Article I, Section 8’s list of federal powers was any mention of establishi­ng a national retirement and disability program. Third, we abandoned the gold standard. Because the quantity of gold is largely fixed, the quantity of dollars is also fixed when dollars are tied to gold. And when the quantity of dollars is fixed, not only can the Fed not want only print money but the federal government is restrained because it can only grow by raising taxes. This gives voters an incentive to apply the brakes to runaway government.

The inflation we feel today is the beginning of the end of a century-long experiment in unlimited government. By kicking the cost of government down the road, generation­s of politician­s have managed to make it look like the unlimited government is affordable. But we’ve reached the end of the road and found the people who must ultimately pay for unlimited government are us. And whether through taxes or inflation, pay we will.

 ?? ?? Antony Davies
Antony Davies

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States