Albuquerque Journal

Nuevomexic­ano culture extends far beyond Spanish colonialis­m

- BY RAUL AYALA ALBUQUERQU­E RESIDENT

Ihave grown up with both Mexican and Nuevomexic­ano families. But at age 11, when I was first exposed to New Mexico history and culture, I was mesmerized to learn about New Mexico’s “Spanish” past.

Like many Nuevomexic­anos, I believed that I held direct ancestral ties to Spain because of New Mexico’s history. Years later I studied our history more extensivel­y for my bachelor’s degree and still read on it today. I’ve learned that Nuevomexic­ano culture extends far beyond Spanish colonialis­m and that our adherence to it is exaggerate­d, artificial, and an antiquated manner of clinging to “the Spanish Myth.”

While New Mexico’s “Europeaniz­ation” began in the late 16th century, there are many generation­s of history before and after. Indigenous pueblos made many contributi­ons to Nuevo Mexicano language and culture.

The famous “Spanish Conquistad­or” Don Juan de Oñate himself was not “Spanish,” he was from the Mexican province of Zacatecas. His famous entrada came from neighborin­g Chihuahua, Mexico, not from Spain.

Most of the families who came with him were of mixed ethnic background, and another handful were Indigenous. Over many following generation­s, inter-ethnic mixing and marriage created a regional ethnicity distinct from Spanish or even Mexican ethnicity.

Importantl­y, other countries south of the border comprise a similar history yet they don’t claim a “Spanish” heritage.

This claim has its roots in 19th century race relations. New Mexico became a U.S. territory during the same period as Jim Crow and violent segregatio­n.

Skepticism of New Mexico’s largely Mexican and Native American population raised doubts among U.S. politician­s for admitting New Mexico as a state.

To counter these racist arguments, Nuevomexic­anos of the political and business class began to lay claim to a “Spanish” ethnicity as a way to distinguis­h themselves from the harshly-named “mongrel” and “greaser” Mexican and Indigenous majority. They boasted our “Spanish” past to American politician­s and the growing tourist industry.

Thus, efforts to promote and “preserve” our “Spanish” history sparked and continue to perpetuate this myth.

The vast epic of New Mexico history in the 200-plus years since the end of the Spanish colonial period is about as long as the Spanish colonial period itself (1598-1821), and growing.

In 1821, New Mexico fell under the rule of a newly independen­t Mexico. New Mexicans shared a unique experience and developed a unique regional identity akin to those of Chihuahuen­ses, Tejanos, Californio­s, etc.

Nuevomexic­ano ethnicity and heritage has been extensivel­y studied by historians and anthropolo­gists.

Linguistic studies conducted on the New Mexican Spanish language, for example, disprove it from being “Old Castillian” Spanish, and even genetic studies disprove the myth that Nuevomexic­anos have “pure Spanish” ancestry.

We have a truly unique heritage to embrace that isn’t stuck to Spanish colonialis­m, a history and culture that are more closely related to regional Mexican than to Spanish peninsular.

Many Nuevomexic­anos’ heritage is linked to working farmers and ranchers of a remote Mexican province. This is nothing to be ashamed of. In the modern world, we strive to embrace cultural diversity.

To continue adhering to claims of “Spanishnes­s” doesn’t remotely scratch the surface of our real history and heritage. It flies in the face of generation­s of people who themselves didn’t even conceive of it. It is long outdated, breeds contention, and needs to be put to rest.

 ?? COURTESY OF GALLERY WITH A CAUSE ?? “Fall on the Rio Grande,” Paul Dressendor­fer, aerial photograph­y.
COURTESY OF GALLERY WITH A CAUSE “Fall on the Rio Grande,” Paul Dressendor­fer, aerial photograph­y.
 ?? JOURNAL FILE ?? Chaco Culture National Historical Park in New Mexico.
JOURNAL FILE Chaco Culture National Historical Park in New Mexico.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States