The Evolving Role of the CG Director of Photography
The key live-action title is gaining traction in the animation business after years of being seen as a largely live-action only task. By Ellen Wolff.
This year, the field of computer animation passed a milestone when Pixar’s Sharon Calahan became the first director of photography whose work has been purely on computer-generated movies to be invited to join the American Society of Cinematographers. Calahan has received director of photography credits since 1998’s A Bug’s Life, and she’s still one of very few working in animation with that title.
“It’s weird that it’s not widely recognized,” says Pixar President Jim Morris, who championed Calahan to the ASC. “Because the fact is — to use the stop-motion analogy, where you’re lighting puppets and miniature sets — in CG, you’re doing the same thing in virtual space. Over time, we found people who were like-minded, and believed that computer graphics was just another arm of cinematography. It’s just another set of tools to create imagery.”
Among the ASC members who shared that belief, and sponsored Calahan, were visual-effects pros Dennis Muren and Dan Mindel, along with director of photography Stephen Goldblatt and two ASC past presidents: Steven Poster and Daryn Okada. Calahan faced what Morris calls, “a Spanish Inquisition of 20 or 25 DPs grilling her. She does her own lighting studies, and she brought samples of how she breaks down a scene. She knocked ’em dead.”
Calahan, who is currently working on Pixar’s 2015 film The Good Dinosaur, is modest about her ASC acceptance, though she admits it was a decades-long dream. “I just had to be prepared to talk about the process. Mostly, they were really curious.”
Some Have It, Some Don’t
It will be interesting to see if Calahan’s ASC breakthrough influences how other CG directors of photography are regarded. Among them is Animal Logic’s Pablo Plaisted ( The LEGO Movie) and Blue Sky’s Renato Falcao, who has director of photography credits on Epic, both Rio movies, and the upcoming Peanuts. Yet major CG movies like Disney’s Frozen and DreamWorks Animation’s How to Train Your Dragon films didn’t credit a director of photography. Instead, the traditional animation job descriptions of layout and lighting supervisors were applied.
“A lot of that is because of how each company’s roots evolved,” says Calahan. “In the early days, Pixar was a lot like Disney is now. Our first model was what we knew: cel animation. That was how we started on Toy Story. But through the process of learning how to make movies, we realized that our process was more akin to how somebody might make a live-action film. So we thought, why don’t we start thinking about it more that way instead of trying to compare it to cel animation, which is a very different working method. A lot depends on where a company — and its talent — is coming from.”
At Pixar, the DP credit is now shared between director of photography — camera and director of photography — lighting, and that’s an evolution that also seems to be happening
at other animation studios that are embracing the CG director of photography role. At Animal Logic, Plaisted received the director of photography credit on The LEGO Movie, but he says the responsibility was shared with lighting supervisor Craig Welsh. Plaisted came to his role after working on previs for Mad Max: Fury Road and as an animator on Happy Feet.
On LEGO, he says, the cameras fell under the umbrella of the layout department. “The analogy to live action breaks down a bit here, since camera was only a portion of what layout was responsible for,” he says. “Previs, layout, asset management, lensing and stereo were all tasks within layout.”
The job of CG director of photography has been evolving at Blue Sky in yet another way since the arrival of live-action director of photography Renato Falcao a half-dozen years ago. “Bringing in someone like me was an evolution. It brought to animation the eye of someone who’s been on a set,” he says. “We changed the name from layout pretty recently. I have the cinematographer credit, but I’m more of a consultant on lighting. In animation there’s a tradition of having a lighting super- visor, but as things continue to evolve, that might change. The lines are blurring.”
Changes in the Pipeline
Calahan thinks the divisions of labor have evolved due to the sequential nature of typical animation pipelines. “Layout would happen pretty early in the process and lighting would happen at the end — and a lot happened in between. The skill sets didn’t necessarily need to overlap. As we have moved forward, we still have distinct roles, but we work more closely together. Our teams are quite large, and you can manage only so many people doing something at the same time. But I don’t see any reason why that can’t change in the future.”
Improvements in technology are likely to contribute to that development, as CG tools become more interactive and feedback gets faster. “The process is becoming more collaborative as the tools become more facile,” says Calahan. “I can be involved earlier in the process. Lighting can affect story and layout and sets and the art department much more than before. And I can do things to support the upstream departments by doing pre-lighting, so they can see what the intent of a scene is going to be. We also talk more as a group. There are fewer barriers to doing that because the tools aren’t in the way anymore. Our mental process has been slowly, gradually, becoming more and more like live action, where everybody is working together at the same time.”
She thinks that might make CG production more inviting to DPs with live-action backgrounds, and notes the contributions of director of photography Roger Deakins to Pixar’s WALL-E, and DreamWorks’ Dragon franchise. “Our process might be less intimidating than people think.”
Falcao agrees, remarking: “The rules of cinematography totally apply to animated movies. For cutting, you need an establishing shot, a medium shot and a close-up. Sometimes, the storyboards will break those rules, which is totally fine. But DPs have to make sure that the viewer doesn’t feel lost — especially in an action sequence.”
Plaisted adds a final caveat. “I put a huge emphasis on the ‘rules’ of classical cinema, but I do think we are obliged to push forward the CG animation medium. For me, the rules are worth breaking whenever story, context and maybe even innovation demand it.”
In the professional graphics-card game, Nvidia holds the top tier with its Quadro K6000 card, which is a pretty heavy-duty investment. But fear not: the more-accessible Quadro K5000 has been upgraded to the Quadro K5200. With this upgrade, the Quadro K5200 is much more comparable to the Quadro K6000 than to its older counterpart, the Quadro K5000.
First, the Quadro K5200 uses the same Kepler technology as the Quadro K6000, in the form of the GK110 chip with clipped wings that lower the number of CUDA cores, texture units and raster units – which is one of the key reasons that it’s a “lower-tier” card than the Quadro K6000. The other key limitation in comparison is that it doesn’t use the dual-precision floating-point performance of the Quadro K6000, so the Quadro K5200 is more geared to throwing images up on the screen rather than hardcore computation acceleration. This limitation could be overcome by taking advantage of compounding processors for additional cards like an Nvidia Tesla.
However, this is not a slight on the Quadro K5200; far from it. The number of CUDA cores is nearly double that of the Quadro K5000, and the amount of RAM has jumped from 4GB to 8GB, and the computing power moved from 2.2 TFLOPS to 3.0. But the power consumption has only increased from 122W to 150W. This means that the efficiency of the card has increased, which means less heat. That’s a good thing.
In my own subjective tests running the card in both an HP z820 and the latest z640, I really had to push them in Maya and Max to begin to see a difference in interactivity. But where I saw a significant difference was in the number of and size of my textures displayed in the viewport. And let’s face it, lighting and look development is getting pushed more and more into the viewport, and the more response you get from the system, the faster you can develop and dial things in.
All this power is available for around $1,900, which is only $200 more than last year’s Quadro K5000. So, really, there is not much downside to going for the Quadro K5200 when the $4,000 price tag of the Quadro K6000 may be daunting.