Antelope Valley Press

Second COVID-19 vaccine set for OK in US

- By MATTHEW PERRONE and LAURAN NEERGAARD

WASHINGTON — A government advisory panel endorsed a second COVID-19 vaccine Thursday, paving the way for the shot to be added to the US vaccinatio­n campaign.

The Food and Drug Administra­tion is expected to follow the recommenda­tion and quickly OK the vaccine from Moderna and the National Institutes of Health. The FDA advisers, in a 20-0 vote, agreed the benefits of the vaccine outweighed the risks for those 18 years old and up.

Once emergency use authorizat­ion is granted, Moderna will begin shipping millions of doses, earmarked for health workers and nursing home residents, to boost the largest vaccinatio­n effort in US history.

The campaign kicked off earlier this week with the first vaccine OK’d in the US, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech. Moderna’s shot showed similarly strong pro

tection, providing 94% protection against COVID-19 in the company’s ongoing study of 30,000 people.

After seven hours of debate over technical details of the company’s study and follow-up plans, nearly all panelists backed making the vaccine available to help fight the pandemic. One panel member abstained.

“The evidence that has been studied in great de

tail on this vaccine highly outweighs any of the issues we’ve seen,” said Dr. Hayley Gans of Stanford University Medical Center.

A second vaccine is urgently needed as Coronaviru­s infections, hospitaliz­ations and deaths climb to new highs ahead of the holidays. The US leads the world in virus totals, with more than 1.6 million confirmed cases and nearly 309,000 re

ported deaths.

Moderna’s vaccine uses the same groundbrea­king technology as Pfizer-BioNTech’s shot. Most traditiona­l vaccines use dead or weakened virus, but both of the new vaccines use snippets of COVID-19’s genetic code to train the immune system to detect and fight the virus. Both require two doses; Moderna’s is four weeks apart.

The two new vaccines will hopefully help “break the back of the pandemic,” said Dr. Arnold Monto of the University of Michigan, who chaired the panel.

Thursday’s review came days after reports of apparent allergic reactions to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in two Alaska health workers. One person had a severe reaction, including shortness of breath, the other had less serious side effects, including lightheade­dness.

While the two vaccines use the same technology, they’re not identical, cautioned Moderna chief medical officer Dr. Tal Zaks. In particular, some of the lipids, or fats, used to coat the two vaccines are different.

“I would not necessaril­y assume” that any reactions would be the same, he said.

The FDA found no severe allergic reactions in Moderna’s data but flagged a slightly higher rate of less serious side effects — rash, hives, itching — among participan­ts who got the vaccine, compared with those receiving a dummy shot.

 ??  ??
 ?? HANS PENNINK/AP ?? A nurse prepares a shot as a study of a possible COVID-19 vaccine, developed by the National Institutes of Health and Moderna Inc., gets underway on July 27 in Binghamton, N.Y.
HANS PENNINK/AP A nurse prepares a shot as a study of a possible COVID-19 vaccine, developed by the National Institutes of Health and Moderna Inc., gets underway on July 27 in Binghamton, N.Y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States