County: No new mandate for masks
LOS ANGELES (CNS) — Citing continued downward trends in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, Los Angeles County scrubbed plans, Thursday, to re-impose a universal indoor mask-wearing mandate that would have taken effect, today.
Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer told reporters, in an online briefing, that the county’s average daily number of new COVID cases, over the past week, was about 5,900 per day, down from 6,750, a week ago. There were 1,239 COVID-positive patients hospitalized in the county, as of Thursday, down from 1,329, a week ago.
She also noted that the average daily rate of people testing positive for the virus has been holding mostly steady.
According to Ferrer, the decline in new infection numbers is “potentially signaling a downward trend in cases.” She said hospitalizations have also begun declining “for the first time since mid-April.”
Declines in new cases and hospitalizations will likely also lead to a reduction in virus-related deaths, she said.
Ferrer had previously said that a new indoor masking mandate would be imposed if the county remained in the “high” virus activity level category as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for two weeks. The county entered the “high” category, exactly two weeks ago, when the average daily rate of new COVID-related hospital admissions rose above 10 per 100,000 residents. That put the county on track to impose a new masking mandate, today.
As of Thursday afternoon, the CDC still put the county’s rate of COVID hospital admissions in the “high” category at 11.5 per 100,000, Ferrer said, but that rate only took into account patient numbers,
through Monday. The county, however, examined the numbers, through Wednesday, which put the rate at 9.7 per 100,000 — enough to move the county back into the “medium” virus activity level.
Ferrer said that figure is “a good reason not to move forward” with an indoor masking mandate, even though it’s likely the county will officially remain in the CDC’s “high” category, for at least another week.
Despite the decision against a mandate, masks are still required in some indoor spaces — health care facilities, transit hubs, on transit vehicles, airports, correctional facilities and shelters. A universal mandate would have spread the requirement to all indoor public spaces, including shared office spaces, manufacturing facilities, retail stores, indoor events, indoor restaurants and bars and schools.
Ferrer said, Thursday, that despite the county’s decision against a mandatory mask-wearing mandate, face coverings are still strongly recommended in locations beyond those where they are required.
“While we are still in this surge, indoor masking is strongly advised everywhere else,” she said.
The possibility of a new mask mandate being implemented prompted much debate, over the past week.
On Wednesday, the city of El Segundo announced it would not enforce a county masking mandate, mirroring a decision made, Monday night, by the city of Beverly Hills.
The cities of Long Beach and Pasadena — both of which operate their own health departments separate from the county — announced, Tuesday, they would not issue mask mandates, even if the county did.
Long Beach and Pasadena officials said they would continue to monitor the COVID situation. Pasadena officials said they would “consider appropriate public health actions to protect our community as the situation changes.”
County Supervisor Kathryn Barger issued a statement, Monday, saying she will not support a new mask mandate. She said she agrees that masks are an effective tool against virus spread, but does not believe imposing a mandate will have the desired effect.
“I am adamantly opposed to mandating the masking, because I truly do believe it’s going to have the opposite effect,” Barger said during Tuesday’s Board meeting.
Supervisor Janice Hahn joined Barger in opposing a possible mandate, saying she fears imposing such a rule would be “very divisive for LA County.”
Ferrer said, Thursday, residents should not fall into complacency in response to the county’s decision against a mask mandate. She reiterated that transmission of COVID-19 remains high across the county, and the virus is still a leading cause of death, killing more people, in the first six months of the year, than drug overdoses, the flu and traffic crashes combined. The number of cases announced by the county, each day, are also believed to be an undercount, since many people rely on at-home tests, the results of which are not always reported to health officials.
Following Ferrer’s announcement taking a mask-mandate off the table, Barger issued a statement praising the move, saying “unenforceable mandates don’t work.”
“I’m hopeful that we will now be able to move on from this heightened focus on masking mandates to what really matters — focusing on promoting the efficacy of vaccines and boosters, improving access to COVID-19 treatments, and continuing to educate our county’s residents on the benefits of masking,” Barger said. “I am comfortable leaving this decision in the public’s very capable hands.”
County Supervisor Hilda Solis also issued a statement saying she thought it was “prudent” for the county to pause a possible new mask mandate, although she continued to urge “vulnerable residents” to wear mask.