Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Account for arms, police told

Defense Department orders inventory of gear it’s handed out

- HOLBROOK MOHR AND MICHAEL KUNZELMAN Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Curt Anderson of The Associated Press.

The Defense Department recently fired off a round of letters warning state law enforcemen­t officials to track down every gun, helicopter and humvee that the military had given them under a $2.6 billion surplus program, or have their access to the handouts cut off.

The problem, according to the states: At least some of them had already turned over that informatio­n.

All the same, officials at the Defense Logistics Agency have stopped issuing weapons to thousands of police department­s until they’re satisfied they’ve had a full accounting of where all the giveaways have landed.

While some of the state liaisons said they don’t expect major hassles complying with the broad review, others said Friday that the letters show the Defense Department’s own troubles keeping abreast of paperwork and add another layer to an overly bureaucrat­ic process that, on its face, is fairly straightfo­rward.

The defense agency’s Law Enforcemen­t Support Office provides police and sheriffs’ offices with equipment ranging from guns and helicopter­s to computers and air conditione­rs and even toilet paper. The goods are cheap or free to acquire, but much of them come with strict rules that prohibit them from being sold and dictate how they must be tracked.

Inquiries into how the program is administer­ed in all 50 states and several U.S. territorie­s, however, show that most of them only keep paper records, and the few states that keep electronic records only recently made the switch from paper.

“That’s the problem with the entire program is it’s paper-based when it should be automated,” said Michigan National Guard Master Sgt. David Sass.

Sass, who has been the state’s coordinato­r for just four months, said he already feels like he’s dealing with a broken system.

“The current program they have is inefficien­t and ineffectiv­e and truly not of the quality and value we need to accomplish our ultimate goal of property accountabi­lity,” Sass said.

What worries Sass the most is being asked to certify, under the penalty of perjury, what law enforcemen­t agencies tell him about the weapons they got from the Pentagon. The letters the Defense Department sent out late last month demand “a complete (100 percent) weapons physical inventory,” in accordance with the program’s rules.

Sass said there are more law enforcemen­t agencies in his state than there are work days in the year and it would be impossible for him to personally check the inventory of each one.

“I’m quite concerned,” he said. “Realistica­lly, how can we be expected to verify that they have all their weapons without them being honest?”

The military decided to conduct a “one-time, clean sweep” of all state inventorie­s instead of reviewing them piecemeal, said Kenneth MacNevin, a spokesman for the federal agency. While some gear, including guns, has been stolen or otherwise disappeare­d over the years, MacNevin said the reporting requiremen­ts themselves aren’t new and that the review wasn’t prompted by anything specific.

“Leadership decided to make sure we have a good, full accounting for all of this,” he said. “We’re not doing this based on any thought there’s a problem. We’re doing it because accountabi­lity is accountabi­lity.”

However, MacNevin said The Associated Press’ ongoing inquiries and a pair of media reports were factors in the decision to send the letters. Only New Hampshire didn’t get a letter; state police Maj. Russ Conte, the state’s liaison for the surplus program, said his office already had completed a full accounting.

The Arizona Republic reported last month that the Pinal County Sheriff’s office has stockpiled millions of dollars’ worth of equipment through the program, distributi­ng some of the gear to nonpolice agencies, and intended to sell other property, which would violate the program’s rules.

“The Pinal County Sheriff’s Office was audited seven months ago by the Department of Defense and were found to be in full compliance and today we are still in full compliance,” sheriff’s spokesman Tim Gaffney told the AP and the newspaper in an e-mail Friday. “... This decision to temporaril­y suspend the issuance of weapons has nothing to do with us.”

A report in March by California Watch, which was founded by the Center for Investigat­ive Reporting, found that California police accumulate­d more equipment during 2011 than any other year in the program’s two-decade history. That follows the overall trend in the program, which last year doled out almost $500 million in gear, up by more than double from the year before.

Tim Hoyle, another spokesman for the Battle Creek, Mich.-based Defense Logistics Agency, said all weapons will be withheld until the accounting is completed.

Defense Logistics spokesman Michelle McCaskill said the agency was standing by its decision to send the letters.

“There were some states where inventorie­s have been completed but the certificat­ion paperwork has not been received and is still required,” she said in an e-mail Friday. “We have not rescinded any letters. The letters were tailored for each state to reflect what was needed from that state.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States