Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Five myths about billionair­es

- DARRELL M. WEST Darrell M. West is vice president of governance studies at the Brookings Institutio­n.

Billionair­es can be fascinatin­g, and not just because of the fortunes they amass. They buy islands and media organizati­ons, experiment with space travel, and have larger-than-life personalit­ies. They also become proxies in national political debates about economic growth, inequality, taxes and fairness. Misconcept­ions abound about their beliefs, businesses and influence. Let’s explore five of the most common myths.

1. Billionair­es can buy elections and change public policy.

According to ProPublica, Sheldon Adelson and his wife, Miriam, spent at least $98 million during the 2012 election cycle. And Charles and David Koch are reportedly spending $290 million in the 2014 cycle to help Republican­s regain control of the Senate and to push policies that limit the role of government.

But money doesn’t always equal political power. Recent elections have been littered with failures on the part of billionair­es. Conservati­ve financiers didn’t defeat President Barack Obama in 2012, despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars to do so. Former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, News Corp. chief executive Rupert Murdoch and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg have failed to persuade members of Congress to pass comprehens­ive immigratio­n reform. This year, Bloomberg is devoting $50 million to lobby legislator­s to adopt relatively mild measures designed to reduce gun violence, but so far the campaign hasn’t produced much legislativ­e action. Conservati­ves have not gotten Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act, despite numerous ads and outreach activities publicizin­g its defects. There has been no meaningful entitlemen­t reform, even though many billionair­es, including Peter Peterson and Stanley Druckenmil­ler, warn about the dangers of high debt levels and the need to address long-term deficits.

Despite all the coverage of national political and policy advocacy, some of the most successful billionair­e efforts have taken place at the state and local levels. Peter Lewis invested millions in lobbying to legalize marijuana in Colorado and Washington. Paul Singer, Seth Klarman, Bill and Melinda Gates, and Jeff Bezos have supported same-sex marriage in various states. John and Laura Arnold have backed public pension reform in California, Rhode Island, Utah, Illinois and New Jersey.

2. Most billionair­es are conservati­ve anti-tax and small-government advocates.

A number of prominent billionair­es are free-market conservati­ves who want to limit the government’s role in the economy. Yet my analysis of Forbes magazine data shows that the 492 billionair­es in the United States have varied interests. For example, James Simons and Jeffrey Katzenberg supported Obama’s re-election effort and have financed moderate and liberal causes. Warren Buffett believes that, as a billionair­e, he should be taxed at a higher rate than his secretary and has joked that “if you have trouble living on $500 million, I’m gonna put out a book, How to Live on $500 Million.” Others, like David Rubenstein, have spoken out about the need to address income inequality. And in terms of state advocacy, there are a number of libertaria­n billionair­es, such as Peter Thiel, whose efforts to keep the government out of personal affairs lean conservati­ve on tax matters but liberal on social issues.

3. Most billionair­es inherited their wealth.

According to Wealth-X and UBS Financial Services, which track highnet-worth individual­s, about 65 percent of billionair­es are self-made. A surprising number, including Steve Jobs and Marc Andreessen, have come from modest or middle-class background­s. They started out with few financial resources, but through innovative ideas and far-sighted thinking they built successful companies and became tremendous­ly wealthy. Being self-made colors their perspectiv­e and often generates a mentality that they deserve to keep the fruits of their labor.

This is one reason many of them were upset when Obama talked about all the help businesspe­ople get from the government in his 2012 “You didn’t build that” campaign speech, in which he declared that “if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own.” Selfmade individual­s in the United States take pride in their initiative and hard work and don’t like being characteri­zed as getting government help through tax policy, investment­s in education and infrastruc­ture expenditur­es, even though many of them have benefited from public policies. For instance, tax rates on capital gains from long-term financial assets tend to be lower than those on ordinary income, and estate taxes have been slashed over the past decade. These policy decisions have helped wealthy individual­s grow and keep their fortunes.

4. All they care about is making money.

There is little doubt that money is a major motivator, yet many billionair­es also have non-material goals. People like George Soros, Sheldon Adelson, and Pierre and Pamela Omidyar see policy problems in the country and around the world and want to contribute their ideas. Soros, for example, has funded grass-roots organizati­ons that advocate for prison reform and freedom of expression. Adelson is a strong supporter of pro-Israel causes. The Omidyars have backed new media platforms designed to improve public understand­ing of government surveillan­ce.

Unlike previous generation­s of wealthy individual­s who did the bulk of their philanthro­py upon their deaths, a number of the current billionair­es are engaging in serious philanthro­py through foundation­s or nonprofit organizati­ons. Nearly 10 percent—including Sara Blakely, Richard Branson, and Steve and Jean Case—have signed the Giving Pledge, agreeing to donate more than half their fortunes to charitable causes during their lifetimes or in their wills. They see it as a way to give back to a society that provided them with so many opportunit­ies.

5. The best way to become a billionair­e is to work on Wall Street.

Graduating college seniors line up at Wall Street firms hoping to land lucrative positions in finance. Many people think this sector holds the best chance for generating wealth. However, my tabulation of the Forbes billionair­e list shows that only 9 percent of billionair­es made their fortunes through finance and banking. The more common avenues for wealth are diversifie­d companies (18 percent of all billionair­es), real estate, constructi­on and hotels (15 percent), and retail and consumer goods (14 percent).

Based on my analysis of young billionair­es, 42 percent earned their wealth through technology firms. This has spawned what Wealth-X chief executive Mykolas Rambus calls “technopren­eurs.” Tech billionair­es such as Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Paul Allen and Sheryl Sandberg are well-placed to transform other parts of society, from education and health care to philanthro­py and academic research. They love to disrupt the status quo; many of them are pioneering new approaches to charity. They will have a dramatic influence on the future of the world—and virtually none of them came from Wall Street.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States