Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Mike Ditka comes around, finally

- KAVITHA DAVIDSON Kavitha A. Davidson writes about sports for Bloomberg News.

Legendary Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka seems to have softened. At least he has seemingly changed his stance on the lawsuit some of his former players brought against the National Football League alleging the indiscrimi­nate dispensing of narcotic painkiller­s. It marks a significan­t shift in attitude for one of the league’s staunchest old-school voices and, if nothing else, should cause some fans to rethink their own views on player safety.

To recap: Last May, three members of the ’85 Bears Super Bowl champion team led a group of retired players in suing the NFL for the practice of team doctors prescribin­g excessive drugs to mask the pain from injuries. The suit claims the doctors were often less than forthcomin­g about the severity of the injuries while regularly ignoring manufactur­ers’ dosage recommenda­tions. According to the players, they were not told of the debilitati­ng side effects from such medication­s and have suffered long-term disability and addiction.

At the time, Ditka responded by touting the same lines of personal responsibi­lity and “that’s just football” that you’d expect from an NFL lifer. “The game of football has been too good to me,” he wrote in the Chicago Sun-Times. “The meds thing … I don’t know. If you don’t want to take them, don’t take them. I don’t think anybody ever forces anyone to do anything.”

This line of thinking is common among the old guard of players, coaches and fans who believe the dangers of football have always been obvious and that any legal action against the NFL amounts to a post-retirement money grab.

Ditka at least acknowledg­es that while football may have been “too good” to him, it wasn’t very good for countless others. On Tuesday night’s episode of HBO’s Real Sports, host Bryant Gumbel discussed the lawsuit with members of the ’85 Bears, who describe an alarming rate of painkiller use and the debilitati­ng damage they’ve suffered later in life. “I was eating 100 Percs a month just to function,” quarterbac­k Jim McMahon said. He added that he also suffered from suicidal thoughts, recalling teammate David Duerson, who shot himself in 2011 and requested his brain be studied for evidence of football-related trauma.

Ditka, too, tells Gumbel of the toll the game has taken on some of his former players, including former defensive tackle William “The Refrigerat­or” Perry—“a very fragile individual now,” in Ditka’s words. He acknowledg­es that painkiller­s were “plentiful,” but still questions who deserves the blame—the coach, the team, the league or the sport? But at the very least, Ditka is laying off his previous stance of blaming the players, calling for the NFL to do more for them in retirement. (Ditka does his part for ailing retirees as president of the Gridiron Greats foundation.)

It’s worth wondering what made Ditka change his mind. Perhaps it’s the number of ways the NFL has shown it doesn’t care about players’ interests above its own. Perhaps it’s the growing litany of evidence of the tangible dangers of football. Perhaps it’s simply getting too hard for even Ditka to outrun the negatives of a game that has been so good to him. Notably, Ditka has joined the growing number of parents who wouldn’t let their children play football. “That’s sad. I wouldn’t. And my whole life was football,” he told Gumbel. “I think the risk is worse than the reward.”

Contrary to sensationa­list headlines, we’re nowhere near the death of football. But Ditka’s change of attitude does show that even those most entrenched in the NFL’s old ways can change, and throws a wrench into the arguments people use to deflect blame from the league onto the players.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States