Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

‘So,’ ‘problemati­c’ top list of annoying, hated words

- CHRISTINE HAUSER THE NEW YORK TIMES

For anyone still having a problem deciding on New Year’s resolution­s, even though 2016 has begun, there are some people in Michigan who might be able to help. They propose that people resolve to never use the word “problemati­c” again.

That is one of more than a dozen words and phrases on the 41st annual list of banished words that Lake Superior State University issues. The list is drawn from a survey of words that people hate, invent or annoyingly overuse.

Previous lists have included hated phrases such as “my bad” (1998), “forced relaxation” (1989), “free gift” (1988), “live audience” (1983, 1987, 1990). Last year’s list deemed “bae,” “polar vortex” and “hack” worthy of exile.

The banishment­s are intended as suggestion­s, or “food for thought,” to use a phrase that sounds as if it might deserve its own banishing.

For the latest list, the most nomination­s went to a wee wisp of a word, the humble, two-letter “so.” It was already banished in 1999, when people were suggesting that it be relegated to the dustbin because of phrases like “I am SO down with this list!”

The list is compiled from nomination­s worldwide, and the university helpfully includes quotes from those who care enough about the Queen’s English to write in.

Here’s why Bob Forrest of Tempe, Ariz., finds “so” so annoying: “Currently, it is being overused as the first word in the answer to ANY question. For instance, ‘How did you learn to play the piano?’ Answer: ‘So my dad was in a classical music club.”

As for the word “problemati­c,” the Urban Dictionary describes it as “a corporate-academic weasel word,” the university noted.

Sometimes, new words simply appear out of nowhere. The need for them suddenly arises from something that is happening in our society, and boom! (banish that), there they are.

Take “manspreadi­ng,” which found a place on the 2016 list. It defines the habit some men have of taking up more space in public transporta­tion than they need, opening their legs and encroachin­g on adjacent seats.

“Men don't need another disgusting-sounding word thrown into the vocabulary to describe something they do ... You're just taking too much room on this train seat, be a little more polite,” Carrie Hansen, of Caledonia, Mich., wrote.

“Vape,” which is derived from the noun “vapor” but is masqueradi­ng as a verb, also made the list. “Vape” and “vaping” are used to describe the act of smoking e-cigarettes (another strange word, the university said).

David Ervin of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, said he hopes the word “goes up in smoke.”

Some of the new entries are compounds or phrases, ugly marriages of unrelated words that correspond to the times. Like this one: “Break the Internet.”

Or, as one word-watcher put it in an example: “I hope the list doesn’t ‘break the internet.’ (How else would I read it next year)?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States