Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

EU tax body set to rule on Apple’s Irish breaks

- DARA DOYLE

Apple is facing a tax bill running into billions of euros, with the European Union poised to release a finding into the company’s dealings in Ireland as soon as today, according to people familiar with the situation.

The European Commission decision is expected to say that Ireland provided the iPhone maker with illegal aid through a sweetheart deal in return for creating jobs in the nation, the people said on condition of anonymity because the details are confidenti­al. Ireland has vowed to fight any adverse finding.

Such a ruling might heighten tensions between Europe and the U. S. over taxation policies, with the U. S. having already complained that Europe is unfairly targeting American companies and threatenin­g global tax reforms.

In preliminar­y findings in 2014, European competitio­n authoritie­s said Apple’s tax arrangemen­ts were improperly designed to help the company financiall­y. There’s a range of estimates on how much Apple might have to pay. In a worst- case scenario, Apple would face a $ 19 billion bill if the government ultimately loses and is forced to recoup tax from the company, according to JPMorgan Chase analyst Rod Hall. The Irish Times reported earlier Monday that the figure might not be much more than $ 112 million, although it later revised its estimate upward.

The European Commission declined to comment on a decision that’s still pending or on the timing of its announceme­nt.

Apple said it had nothing to add to previous statements rejecting suggestion­s it received selective treatment from Irish officials. The ministry declined to comment.

“A state aid ruling against Ireland is likely to bring the country’s corporatio­n tax regime back into focus,” said Dermot O’Leary, an economist at Goodbody Stockbroke­rs in Dublin. “However, the commission investigat­ion relates to two rulings given to Apple in 1991 and 2007. So, a critical issue will be how the final decision relates to the current Irish tax code or to previously amended policy.”

The commission in January ordered Belgium to recover about $ 783 million in illegal tax breaks from at least 35 companies, including Anheuser- Busch InBev and BP. And last year, for example, Starbucks was ordered to pay $ 33.5 million in back taxes to the Dutch government.

As of last month, Apple had $ 232 billion in cash, with about $ 214 billion of that being held overseas.

The U. S. Treasury Department has pushed back hard against the state aid investigat­ions, most recently with an unusual white paper that said the Brussels- based commission had overextend­ed its legal authority and threatened global tax reforms.

The Commission- ordered repayments could wind up costing American taxpayers under U. S. tax law, and benefit EU taxpayers, the U. S. said. That’s because multinatio­nal corporatio­ns with large foreign operations, such as Apple, are allowed to claim a credit against their U. S. tax bills for any foreign taxes paid, an offset that reduces their tax payments to U. S. coffers.

Treasury Secretary Jack Lew first raised formal objections to the investigat­ions in a letter last February to top European Commission and EU officials, emphasizin­g socalled unfair targeting of U. S. companies — a charge that European regulators deny — and a potential damping effect on direct foreign investment.

Robert Stack, the Treasury’s top official for internatio­nal tax affairs, underscore­d in a blog post that accompanie­d last week’s white paper one of the department’s biggest objections to the investigat­ions: that EU regulators were changing the rules of the game without warning.

Calling the investigat­ions “new” and “unforeseea­ble,” Stack wrote that regulators “should not seek to impose recoveries under this new approach in a retroactiv­e manner because it sets a bad precedent for tax policymake­rs around the world.”

The Treasury Department didn’t immediatel­y respond to a request for comment Monday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States