Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Justices let judge go back to work

- JEANNIE ROBERTS

A Garland County circuit judge acquitted in the hot- car death of his toddler can return to the bench despite an ongoing investigat­ion by the state’s Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

Wade Naramore, who sits on the bench in the 18th East Judicial Circuit and previously presided over all the circuit’s juvenile cases, is “mentally fit to return to his position,” Naramore’s lawyers, Erin Cassinelli and Patrick Benca, told the state’s highest court in a motion to lift the suspension.

“This is a good thing,” Cassinelli said. “Judge Naramore is eager to return to serving the citizens of Garland County.”

Naramore no longer will be able to hear dependency-neglect cases and cannot return to the bench until Marcia Hearnsberg­er, the administra­tive judge of

the 18th East Judicial Circuit, submits an amended administra­tive plan to redistribu­te that caseload among the other judges.

The Supreme Court order gave Hearnsberg­er seven days to submit the new plan, but Hearnsberg­er said the district’s administra­tive committee met Thursday morning and an amended plan would be submitted to the Supreme Court today.

Naramore’s attorneys and the Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission filed a joint petition for bench suspension to the state Supreme Court in February last year. Days later, state prosecutor­s charged Naramore with misdemeano­r negligent homicide in the July 24, 2015, death of his 17- monthold son, Thomas Naramore, who died after being left in a

hot car for more than five hours.

In August, a jury acquitted Naramore — who testified that he “lost awareness” that his son was in the vehicle and forgot to drop him off at day care.

However, the exoneratin­g judgment did not automatica­lly end an ongoing Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission investigat­ion. A three- member panel composed of alternate members of the full commission must ensure that a judge is fit to be on the bench.

Naramore testified in the trial that his son’s death and the subsequent legal issues were “extremely traumatic” for him and required medication as well as mental- health therapy several days a week.

A psychiatri­c evaluation by a Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission doctor determined that Naramore was mentally fit to return to the bench.

“As to his mental fitness to be on the bench, that’s all true and I agree with it,” said David

Sachar, executive director of the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission.

Sachar said the commission was not ready to recommend Naramore return to the bench until the investigat­ion was complete, but that he does not begrudge Cassinelli and Benca for taking the matter to the Supreme Court.

“Judge Naramore is represente­d by excellent counsel, and they were ready for the suspension to be lifted,” Sachar said. “They were doing what’s best for their client and have been very cooperativ­e with us. This has been a fact- driven, nonadversa­rial process.”

The lengthy investigat­ion hit a snag regarding a matter that is confidenti­al and sealed by a lower court, Sachar said.

“It’s a unique, novel situation that we’re facing over here,” Sachar said. “We don’t know if it’s a violation or an impediment, but it is serious enough of an issue that it made us want

to look at it. I am proud of our panel for being considerat­e of all issues and for opposing counsel being so cooperativ­e.”

The state Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against Naramore’s request to keep the commission’s investigat­ive report under seal. The confidenti­al matter that was sealed by the lower court will be redacted from the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission’s current investigat­ive report before it is submitted to the high court today, Sachar said.

There is no timeline on when the commission’s investigat­ion will be completed and a decision rendered, Sachar said.

“The end result will be that the JDDC will either dismiss the case, negotiate a settlement or refer the case to the full commission for a formal hearing,” Sachar said.

He added that it’s “not lost on us how difficult this has been on the judge and the family as well as the judicial staff over there. We take our jobs seriously and we go through our cases very deliberate­ly.”

In the meantime, Hearnsberg­er, the administra­tive judge in Naramore’s circuit, said Naramore could return to the bench in Hot Springs as early as Monday if the Supreme Court approves the caseload redistribu­tion plan today.

Naramore continued to receive his $ 160,000 salary since the day of his suspension, as required by law. The state has spent nearly $ 70,000 on special judges to serve in Naramore’s absence since Thomas’ death.

An additional $ 2,615 was paid to retired Circuit Judge John Langston, who presided over Naramore’s trial.

Hearnsberg­er said that redistribu­ting Naramore’s prohibited caseload — those of the dependency-neglect kind — had not been difficult.

According to a previous administra­tive plan, Naramore oversaw about 2,321 cases in 2014.

That caseload included 100 percent of the juvenile cases, 25 percent of the domestic- relations ones and 15 percent of probate cases.

Of those, Hearnsberg­er said Naramore oversaw 141 dependency-neglect cases. There were 227 dependency- neglect cases in Naramore’s jurisdicti­on in 2016, Hearnsberg­er added.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States