Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

White House pair filled Nunes in

Sources name two who gave lawmaker intelligen­ce reports

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT- GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS

WASHINGTON — A pair of White House officials played a role in providing the Republican chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee with the intelligen­ce reports that showed President Donald Trump and his associates were incidental­ly swept up in foreign surveillan­ce by U. S. spy agencies.

The White House on Thursday invited lawmakers from both parties to view classified material it said relates to surveillan­ce of the president’s associates.

The panel’s chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, has been faulted by his congressio­nal colleagues for sharing the informatio­n with Trump before consulting with other members of the Intelligen­ce Committee, which is supposed to be conducting an independen­t investigat­ion of Russia’s meddling in the last presidenti­al election

The congressma­n has refused to identify his sources, saying he needed to protect them so others would feel safe going to the committee with sensitive informatio­n. He disclosed the existence

of the intelligen­ce reports March 22, and in his public comments he has described his sources as whistleblo­wers trying to expose wrongdoing at great risk to themselves.

Several current U. S. officials identified the White House officials as Ezra CohenWatni­ck, the senior director for intelligen­ce at the National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, a lawyer who works on national security matters at the White House counsel’s office and formerly worked on the staff of the House Intelligen­ce Committee.

The Washington Post reported that after assembling reports that showed that Trump campaign officials were mentioned or inadverten­tly monitored by U. S. spy agencies targeting foreign citizens, Cohen-Watnick took the matter to the top lawyer for the National Security Council, John Eisenberg. Ellis works for Eisenberg.

A White House spokesman declined to comment.

Cohen- Watnick is a former Defense Intelligen­ce Agency official who was originally brought to the White House by Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser. The officials said that this month, shortly after Trump wrote on Twitter about being wiretapped on the orders of President Barack Obama, CohenWatni­ck began reviewing highly classified reports detailing the intercepte­d communicat­ions of foreign officials.

Officials said the reports consisted primarily of ambassador­s and other foreign officials talking about how they were trying to develop contacts within Trump’s family and inner circle in advance of his inaugurati­on.

The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the intelligen­ce and to avoid angering Cohen- Watnick and Ellis. Officials say Cohen- Watnick has been reviewing the reports from his fourth- floor office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, where the National Security Council is based.

But the officials’ descriptio­n of the intelligen­ce is in line with Nunes’ own characteri­zation

of the material, which he has said was not related to the Russia investigat­ions when he first disclosed its existence in a hastily arranged news conference.

Nunes told reporters last week that he had seen troubling informatio­n about the improper distributi­on of Trump associates’ intercepte­d communicat­ions, and he briefed the president on the material, all before informing Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the committee’s top Democrat.

According to Nunes, he received a phone call from a source the night before and then rushed to meet the person on the grounds of the White House.

The next day, Nunes gave a news briefing at the Capitol and then returned to the White House to brief Trump on the informatio­n.

‘ A LOT OF QUESTIONS’

Trump spokesman Sean Spicer said Thursday that the material the White House wants the House and Senate intelligen­ce leaders to view was discovered by the National Security Council through the course of regular business. He would not say whether it was the same material Nunes already had seen.

Spicer previously had dismissed the notion that the White House had funneled informatio­n to Nunes, saying the idea that the congressma­n would go and brief Trump on material the president’s team already had “doesn’t pass the smell test.” The White House quickly embraced Nunes’ revelation­s, saying they vindicated Trump’s claim that Obama wiretapped his New York skyscraper.

Speaking Thursday on Capitol Hill, Schiff said he was “more than willing” to accept the White House offer to view new informatio­n. But he raised concerns that Trump officials may have used Nunes to “launder informatio­n to our committee to avoid the true source.”

“The White House has a lot of questions to answer,” he declared.

Nunes and Schiff have had dueling news conference­s in the days since Nunes’ revelation­s, fueling criticism that the committee is unable to conduct a serious, bipartisan investigat­ion.

Nunes has acknowledg­ed that the incidental intelligen­ce gathering on Trump associates last year was not necessaril­y unlawful. U. S. intelligen­ce agencies typically monitor foreign officials of allied and hostile countries, and they routinely sweep up communicat­ions linked to Americans who may be taking part in the conversati­on or are being spoken about.

The real issue, Nunes has said, was that he could figure out the identities of Trump associates from reading reports about intercepte­d communicat­ions that were shared among Obama administra­tion officials with top security clearances. He said some Trump associates also were identified by name in the reports. Normally, intelligen­ce agencies mask the identities of U. S. citizens who are incidental­ly present in intercepte­d communicat­ions.

 ?? AP/ J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE ?? Rep. Adam Schiff raised concerns Thursday that Rep. Devin Nunes may have been used by the White House “to launder inSee formation to our committee.”
AP/ J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE Rep. Adam Schiff raised concerns Thursday that Rep. Devin Nunes may have been used by the White House “to launder inSee formation to our committee.”
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States