Good, can be better

I read with interest last Saturday about Mike Masterson’s thoughts on creating a successful newspaper in today’s world. His concept, albeit utopian, contained some real as well as some subliminal messages with which I totally agree. Mike is to be commended for a desire to make something good even better.

In that light, I would like to add some additional thoughts which in my view would enhance “Mike’s Morning Messenger’s” ability to appeal to an expanded readership.

First, since letter-writers are discouraged from using caustic language and name-calling, that should also apply to syndicated columnists such as “deer in the headlights” Paul Krugman. In the same issue as Mike’s piece, he referred to President Trump as “lazy, ignorant, dishonest and vindictive.” He obviously couldn’t make a living in his chosen profession so he took up writing, which in my opinion is also a dismal failure. Consequently, he should be limited to one missive per month, subject to intense editing.

Second, to add credibility to “Mike’s Morning Messenger,” John Brummett should likewise be limited to once a month until he can graduate from childish name-calling such as the worn-out “preposterous second-place president.”

Third, limit Philip Martin’s word salad to 50 words or less. Alternatively, an interpreter could be hired to explain what the heck he said. Sorry, we are not all Ivy League academics.

Finally, with “Mike’s Morning Messenger” gaining steam with would-be advertisers waiting in line, someone surely could address the case of the curling corners. Sherlock, where are you? Deus existo nobis. HOWARD D. HUGHES

Maumelle