Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Overbooked forever

- STEPHEN MIHM

The revelation­s last week that airlines overbook as a policy and that they can forcibly remove passengers when their calculatio­ns go awry has shocked millions from Chicago to China. But it’s a problem as old as the industry.

As they expanded service in the late 1940s, airlines struggled with the problem of no-shows. This was a serious problem: A half-empty plane— even one with a few empty seats—could operate at a loss, or with severely diminished profits.

Overbookin­g was the solution, albeit one likely discovered by accident. Prior to the 1950s airline reservatio­ns were a low-tech affair. Each airline had a “master board” at headquarte­rs that showed all the available seats on any given flight. The clerk overseeing the master board would put a green flag next to flights that had only a few seats left, and a red flag when filled entirely. This cumbersome system, though, did not operate in real time, so it was easy to over-sell a flight by mistake.

The airlines, however, quickly realized that this wasn’t a problem: Virtually every flight had its share of no-shows. It didn’t take long for executives to realize that overbookin­g was a fantastic money-making strategy.

By 1950 the practice had become widespread. So too did the complaints of irate passengers.

Congress, stirred by irate constituen­ts, began pushing for action. In July 1956 the Civilian Aeronautic­s Board sent out a letter warning the major carriers to curtail the practice.

The airlines fought back, claiming that any overbookin­g that happened was an honest mistake, not a result of policy. This, to put it politely, was highly unlikely.

Enter economist Julian Simon. In a short but cheeky article published in a very obscure academic journal in 1977, Simon proposed a novel solution: Airlines should conduct an auction, with passengers offering sealed bids as to what they would be willing to accept for the inconvenie­nce of getting bumped. The lowest bidder (or bidders) would get bumped and receive a voucher; everyone else would fly on schedule. “All parties benefit, and no party loses,” wrote Simon.

Simon didn’t expect the article to be taken seriously. It was written in a lightheart­ed tone.

But Simon was on to something. In subsequent years, airlines gradually adopted a crude version of the auction, offering vouchers at a certain price, and if this failed to attract passengers, raising the price.

Unfortunat­ely the auction system was grafted onto older regulation­s governing how much money passengers could be paid. Today that figure is a maximum of $1,350.

If regulators want to solve this problem for good, they should consider the vexed history of overbookin­g and abolish this upper limit, then implement Simon’s proposal in its entirely. That means airlines should be permitted to overbook flights but when they need to bump passengers, they should remove only people who have voluntaril­y given up their seats for a voucher, with the price set by auction.

Perhaps that price will be $500; it may well be $5,000. But one imagines that after handing out some vouchers in the high four figures, the airlines may, after 70 years, finally curtail their reliance on overbookin­g.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States