Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Sessions puts 9 ‘sanctuarie­s’ on notice

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS

Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Friday demanded that nine jurisdicti­ons produce proof that they are communicat­ing with federal authoritie­s about illegal aliens or risk losing grant funding.

Sessions sent letters to the nine jurisdicti­ons, including Philadelph­ia, New York and Chicago, in the latest sign that President Donald Trump’s administra­tion intends to punish what are sometimes called sanctuary cities that do not cooperate in its promised crackdown on illegal aliens.

Trump signed an executive order in January declaring that sanctuary jurisdicti­ons would not be eligible for federal grants, and

Sessions vowed last month during a White House news conference to take Justice Department money from such places.

How far Trump can go, though, and what jurisdicti­ons can do to avoid his ire remain unclear.

The federal grants at stake provide funding for a host of functions in the criminal-justice system — including policing, victim-and-witness initiative­s, crime prevention, drug-treatment programs and technology improvemen­ts.

In a news release, the Justice Department said the places were identified in a Justice Department Inspector General’s Office report from May as potentiall­y having policies that hindered communicat­ion with U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t.

The letters were addressed to officials in New Orleans; Philadelph­ia; Chicago; New York City; Clark County, Nev.; Miami-Dade County, Fla.; Milwaukee County, Wis.; Cook County, Ill.; and the state of California.

“Additional­ly, many of these jurisdicti­ons are also crumbling under the weight of illegal immigratio­n and violent crime,” the Justice Department wrote in a news release, casting aspersions on New York, Chicago and the Bay Area in particular.

The release said New York, for example, which has seen significan­t recent reductions in crime, “continues to see gang murder after gang murder, the predictabl­e consequenc­e of the city’s ‘soft on crime’ stance.” It said crime in Chicago had “skyrockete­d.” And it said that after a raid on MS-13 gang members in the Bay Area, “city officials seemed more concerned with reassuring illegal immigrants that the raid was unrelated to immigratio­n than with warning other MS-13 members that they were next.”

Some representa­tives of the jurisdicti­ons disputed Sessions’ characteri­zation of what was happening.

One of the stronger reactions came from officials in New York City, where Mayor Bill de Blasio called the “soft on crime” characteri­zation “absolutely outrageous.”

“Attorney General Sessions is supposed to be the leading law enforcemen­t official in America,” de Blasio said. “Why would he insult the men and women who do this work every day, who put their lives on the line and who have achieved so much?”

Police Commission­er James O’Neill, who appeared with de Blasio at police headquarte­rs, said the “soft on crime” statement made his blood boil.

He said his Police Department, by far the nation’s largest, locked up more than 1,000 people in 100 gang takedowns last year.

“Maybe we should ask them if we’re soft on crime,” he said.

Seth Stein, a spokesman for City Hall in New York City, said the administra­tion’s push was “nothing new” and that the “grandstand­ing shows how out of touch the Trump administra­tion is with reality.”

California’s Attorney General Xavier Becerra also issued a strong rebuke to the letter.

“California has a right to determine how it will provide for the safety and general welfare of its residents and to safeguard their constituti­onal rights,” Becerra said in a statement. “Fear-mongering and

falsehoods will not intimidate our state into compromisi­ng our values. Federal threats to take away resources from law enforcemen­t or our people in an attempt to bully states and localities into carrying out the new administra­tion’s unsound deportatio­n plan are reckless and jeopardize public safety.”

Across that state, several cities had directed their lobbyists to oppose such efforts even before the federal letters were sent. Oakland, San Francisco and Pasadena have identified the funding cutoff as a lobbying priority in Washington, federal records show.

“While Pasadena is not a sanctuary city, the city does not believe others should be penalized,” said William Boyer, a spokesman for the city. The City Council has declared that it will “oppose efforts to deny federal funding to so-called ‘sanctuary cities,’ or communitie­s that may not have the resources to enforce federal immigratio­n laws.”

New Orleans’ Zach Butterwort­h, the city’s director of federal relations and executive counsel to the mayor, had a more tempered response.

Butterwort­h said the city welcomed the letter and would respond next week telling Sessions that it is fully complying with federal law. He said that sanctuary city is an ill-defined term and that New Orleans did not accept the label.

“There’s a lot of political talk, but there’s no legal analysis,” Butterwort­h said. “We say we’re not one because we follow federal law.”

While the city tells its police officers not to ask people they encounter about their immigratio­n status, it does not block them from talking to Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agents, Butterwort­h said. He said the city updated its policy to better reflect federal law last year.

“If they need one more letter, we’re happy to send it, and we’ll get it turned around quickly,” Butterwort­h said.

He added that the New Orleans Police Department has seen a 28 percent drop in calls for service from people with limited English-speaking ability since November.

“People are scared, and because of that, they’re less willing to report crime,” Butterwort­h said.

Michael Hernandez, the communicat­ions director for Miami-Dade County, said Mayor Carlos Gimenez, a Republican, “strongly believes that we are in compliance” with the law and noted that the county had begun earlier this year to honor all requests from Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t to detain potential illegal aliens taken into custody on local charges.

That move prompted Trump to praise the county in January. “Right decision. Strong!” he wrote on Twitter.

Sessions said in a recent Fox News appearance that he was “pleased that Miami complied.”

Hernandez said the county had stopped honoring the requests in 2013 because the federal government was not providing reimbursem­ent for the cost of detaining suspected illegal aliens, but, fearing the loss of federal funding, officials had decided to change course.

“We never proclaimed to be a sanctuary community before then, and we haven’t since,” Hernandez said.

Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele said in a statement that officials were “in compliance with the law and will share the required legal opinion by the date requested,” though the Justice Department’s comments about illegal immigratio­n and violent crime were “neither accurate nor productive.”

“Milwaukee County has its challenges but they are not caused by illegal immigratio­n,” Abele said. “My far greater concern is the proactive disseminat­ion of misinforma­tion, fear, and intoleranc­e.”

In Chicago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a Democrat, said in a statement: “Neither the facts nor the law are on their side. Regardless, let me be clear: Chicago’s values and Chicago’s future are not for sale.”

The law that Sessions wants enforced is very narrow, and it would not bar any of the policies that people generally associate with sanctuary jurisdicti­ons.

When people are arrested locally, their fingerprin­ts are run through the FBI database, and — whether local authoritie­s like it or not — Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t can tell if they are in the country illegally. It then often will send a request to local authoritie­s to detain such people.

Refusing to honor such a request would not necessaril­y violate federal law. But telling police officers, for example, that they could not give informatio­n to their immigratio­n-enforcemen­t counterpar­ts might.

President Barack Obama’s administra­tion also had considered compliance with the law a requiremen­t for receiving Justice Department grants, and in response to the Inspector General’s Office report, even issued guidance on the subject. Cities, though, have said they are worried that Sessions’ threats are not mere talk.

Seattle, San Francisco and Santa Clara County have sued over the matter, asking a federal judge to block Trump’s executive order and stop Sessions from making good on his threat. The Justice Department has fought the cases in court, and acting Assistant Attorney General Chad Readler argued at a recent hearing that it was premature for the judge to consider the case because the Justice Department had not yet taken any sort of “enforcemen­t action.”

The dollar amounts for the grants in question are relatively small compared with the overall budgets of the government­s that received the letters. For example, according to the Justice Department, New York City received a $4.3 million grant in 2016.

California received $10.4 million, divvied up among 128 cities and counties; Chicago and Cook County, where that city is, shared a $2.3 million grant; New Orleans received $265,832; Nevada’s Clark County received $11,537; Philadelph­ia received $1.7 million; Miami-Dade County received $481,347; and Milwaukee County received $937,932.

 ?? AP/The El Paso Times/RUBEN R. RAMIREZ ?? Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks to reporters Thursday after he and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly (left) toured ports of entry in El Paso, Texas. On Friday, Sessions sent letters threatenin­g to cut funding to nine jurisdicti­ons that...
AP/The El Paso Times/RUBEN R. RAMIREZ Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks to reporters Thursday after he and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly (left) toured ports of entry in El Paso, Texas. On Friday, Sessions sent letters threatenin­g to cut funding to nine jurisdicti­ons that...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States