Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Court tosses federal data theft lawsuit

Unions sought compensati­on for victims of government database hack

- ERIC YODER

A federal court has rejected a lawsuit seeking compensati­on for millions of federal employees, retirees and others whose personal informatio­n was stolen from two government databases.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia said Tuesday that it has no jurisdicti­on over cases brought by two federal unions after the hacking of Office of Personnel Management databases, which was revealed in mid2015 but occurred months before. Those databases included names, addresses and Social Security numbers; in many cases personal financial and legal informatio­n; and in some cases fingerprin­ts.

In response, the government has provided free services such as credit and identity monitoring and identity theft insurance.

Separate lawsuits by the American Federation of Government Employees and the National Treasury Employees Union sought financial damages for the victims.

The lawsuits argued the government knew that hack- ers regularly targeted its systems but that it failed to maintain adequate safeguards. They also said the victims remain at continuing risk of having their informatio­n misused.

The court, addressing the cases together, wrote that though the allegation­s are “troubling,” there is no legal basis to even consider them.

It said the situation did not meet the test that “a plaintiff who claims an actual injury must be able to connect it to the defendant’s actions, and a person who is pointing to a threat of future harm must show that the harm is certainly impending or that the risk is substantia­l.”

The right to bring a claim for damages under the Privacy Act “is expressly limited to those who can demonstrat­e that they have suffered actual economic harm as a result of the government’s statutory violation. The law is clear that the statute does not create a cause of action for those who have been merely aggrieved by, or are even actively worried about, the fact that their informatio­n has been taken.”

Nor do other laws cited by the unions allow for suing the government “to enforce its informatio­n security obligation­s, and no court has expressly recognized a right to data security arising under the Constituti­on,” District Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote for the court.

The National Treasury Employees Union said it was disappoint­ed with the ruling and already has filed an appeal. “We will make our case there that NTEU members were harmed by the breaches and that OPM’s indifferen­ce to securing its databases in the years leading up to the breaches violated NTEU members’ constituti­onal right to informatio­nal privacy,” union President Tony Reardon said in a statement.

The larger of the two breaches involved about 21.5 million people who had undergone background checks since about 2000, including federal, military and contractor personnel who sought new or renewed security clearances, as well as people checked merely to gain access to certain government facilities. The other breach involved personnel records of about 4.2 million current or former federal employees. Overlap between the two brought the total affected to about 22.1 million.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States