Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Minister’s phone out as porn trial evidence

- JOHN LYNCH

Police illegally searched the cellphone of a Sherwood minister that authoritie­s say links him to a trove of online child pornograph­y, a Pulaski County circuit judge has ruled, barring prosecutor­s from using the device as evidence at his upcoming trial.

Judge Herb Wright also prohibited prosecutor­s from using the Sherwood police interview with David Glynn Reynolds as evidence because that questionin­g, about Reynolds’ use of the Twitter social media service, only occurred because police had exceeded their authority by examining the phone.

The Arkansas attorney general’s office, which is prosecutin­g the case, has not indicated whether it will appeal Wright’s decision, which was released Monday. Prosecutor­s have limited authority to appeal such a decision.

Reynolds, 42, is charged with 30 counts of distributi­ng, possessing or viewing material depicting sexually explicit conduct involving a child. Each count carries a maximum of 10 years in prison.

Reynolds, a married father

of two, had been a pastor at Cornerston­e Bible Fellowship for about six years. He was relieved of his duties at the Warden Road church three days before his May 2016 arrest.

Reynolds was removed after he told two church elders that he had been involved with pornograph­y, although he denied involvemen­t with child pornograph­y, the church said in a statement released after his arrest.

The state’s attorneys had petitioned the judge to make Reynolds surrender his phone for further examinatio­n, but Wright refused in his 15-page ruling.

The judge sided with defense attorney Blake Hendrix in finding that Sherwood detective Frank Spence had exceeded the authority granted through a search warrant by seizing Reynolds’ phone. Investigat­ors performed a quick computer analysis of the phone

and quickly returned it to him.

“Though the warrant itself was valid, in executing that warrant, the detective oversteppe­d his bounds and extended that search warrant into a personal search of the defendant that would be more appropriat­e in an arrest-warrant scenario,” Wright wrote.

The judge also found fault with how Spence pressured Reynolds into allowing police to examine his phone. Spence told Reynolds that if he did not unlock the device for investigat­ors to examine it, they would get a court order to compel him to give them access to the device.

“Any statements made as a result of the illegal access to this phone or the representa­tion to the defendant that they could get a judge to compel him to unlock the phone were gained by the police’s improper extension of a … warrant to a search of the defendant’s person,” the ruling states.

“As the statements came about by exploitati­on of that warrant, the court will not permit

them to be used … against the defendant.”

The house search was legally conducted under the warrant, the judge ruled, rejecting accusation­s that Spence had violated Reynolds’ rights when the detective questioned the pastor during the house search.

But the subsequent formal police interrogat­ion cannot be used against Reynolds because it is “the fruit of the poisonous tree,” according to the judge.

Reynolds was questioned about whether he used the Twitter service, and that line of questionin­g by police only came about because of the illegal phone examinatio­n, Wright stated. The “fruit” reference is a well-known legal metaphor describing evidence obtained illegally.

The investigat­ion that led to Reynolds began in January 2016 after the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children contacted Spence about someone using Twitter to dispense or view child porn through its direct-messaging feature.

Authoritie­s determined the account had been accessed numerous times by users. Spence was able to link one user, identified as sweettooth­candy3, to Reynolds’ home, court filings show.

The center for missing children followed up with informatio­n that another user, Ethanluvs TS, which police also traced to Reynolds’ home, had uploaded child pornograph­y to the account.

Investigat­ors searched the house in March 2016, which is when Reynolds’ phone was taken and examined. Reynolds denied having a Twitter account, and the quick phone search found nothing.

But investigat­ors had also copied the phone’s contents, and a later review of the informatio­n from the device showed that the Twitter applicatio­n had previously been installed on the phone and the applicatio­n had been linked to the sweettooth­candy3 account. Authoritie­s wanted to examine the phone further to pursue that connection.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States