Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Rx-pot licensee picks pushed into ’18

Deluge of applicatio­ns to sell, grow drug overwhelms commission­ers

- JOHN MORITZ

An avalanche of applicatio­ns to grow or sell medical marijuana in Arkansas, and the tedious work of preparing them for final review, mean a final decision of who receives one of the state’s coveted pot business licenses won’t be made until well into next year, officials said Monday.

The Arkansas Medical Marijuana Commission, which met for the first time Monday since the Sept. 18 deadline to apply for a cultivator or dispensary license, set Dec. 15 as the date when it will start receiving applicatio­ns for review, with names and other identifyin­g informatio­n redacted to assure unbiased decisions.

But even that deadline may have to be pushed back, the commission­ers conceded, and hundreds of applicatio­ns will still come in on a rolling basis afterward, possibly for months.

For Arkansans who voted last November to legalize medical marijuana, there was no good approximat­ion Monday as to when it could be available on dispensary shelves, said Department of Finance and Administra­tion attorney Joel DiPippa, who advises the five-member commission.

In a positive sign for patients with qualifying conditions, however, the state finance department announced Monday that at least four dispensary applicatio­ns had been submitted in each of the eight regions of the state that the commission had previously agreed on in order to spread the shops out.

Indeed, each region received four times the number of applicatio­ns for a dispensary as the commission will ultimately award.

The southwest corner of

the state received the fewest number of dispensary applicatio­ns, 16, while the northeast corner received the highest, 44.

Pulaski County, the state’s most populous county, received the most dispensary applicatio­ns for any single county, 26.

In total, the state received 227 applicatio­ns for dispensari­es, and 95 applicatio­ns for cultivatio­n centers, where the plants will be grown.

The commission is not planning to limit how many cultivatio­n centers go in one area, and the majority of those applicatio­ns came from the fertile Delta.

After hearing from DiPippa and Alcoholic Beverage Control Director Mary Robin Casteel about the amount of personnel — 10 — and time that was being put into “depersonal­izing” each applicatio­n, the commission voted to start receiving the cultivator applicatio­ns first on Dec. 15.

While the commission­ers begin to score those applicatio­ns, agency staff will start going through and redacting dispensary applicatio­ns, and handing them over to the commission­ers region by region.

“Our goal is not to delay at all, our goal is to meet these requiremen­ts,” DiPippa said, referring the need

for the commission to score each applicant impartiall­y, without knowing the identity of those behind it.

In addition to depersonal­izing each applicatio­n, staff has to go through a separate redacting process that will meet the requiremen­ts of Arkansas’ public records law, so that the applicatio­ns can be released to the press and the public, DiPippa said.

It’s also taking longer than expected to have all the applicants screened through an FBI background check, DiPippa said, and some of the last-minute applicatio­ns are starting to come back with technical issues, such as a smudged fingerprin­t.

Storm Nolan, the president of the Arkansas Cannabis Industry Associatio­n and the backer of an applicatio­n for a dispensary and cultivatio­n center in Fort Smith, said he was not surprised by the wait.

“The ladies working at the [Alcoholic Beverage Control office] are amazingly cool, calm, collected,” handling hundreds of applicatio­ns, Nolan said. “Kudos to them.”

Separately at the meeting, the commission had to vote

to clear up some discrepanc­ies between what its rules required of applicants and what was written on the actually applicatio­n.

Casteel, the beverage control director, said in some cases the applicatio­ns appeared to ask for more documents on certain requiremen­ts — such as residency requiremen­ts — than the rules required.

After one of the commission­ers suggested taking time to allow applicants to resubmit documentat­ion — and receiving audible grumbles from the crowd — the commission­ers voted to go with what was required on the applicatio­n.

The commission­ers also agreed to completely refund any applicatio­n that was disqualifi­ed for not meeting the minimum requiremen­ts or was withdrawn by the applicant. Applicants that meet the minimum requiremen­ts, but which in the end are not selected, will receive half their money back.

The applicatio­n fee for a dispensary license was $7,500 and the applicatio­n for a cultivator’s license was $15,000.

As of Monday, only one applicant had withdrawn its bid, Casteel said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States