Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Daughter’s oversharin­g with parents angers son-in-law

- CAROLYN HAX

DEAR CAROLYN: Our son-in-law recently lodged a complaint that our daughter shared: that we are “far too involved” in their personal business. It makes him uncomforta­ble to know his wife talks to her parents about much of their lives.

We understand and would happily step back, but are not sure how to accomplish that considerin­g they live rentfree in a house we own — this arrangemen­t was supposed to last a year, but has stretched to three — and receive free child care from us two days a week. We are not choosing to be so intimately involved in their daily lives, but do not see how it’s avoidable when they are so reliant on us.

They are not in a position to buy a house yet, and it would be wasteful for them to start renting just to have more independen­ce from us. No one wants to end the baby-sitting arrangemen­t, although this is largely what’s leading to our son-in-law’s discomfort. Also, I am not sure our daughter was supposed to share her husband’s comment. We are feeling awkward, underappre­ciated and a little bit hurt. What should we do?

— Washington, D.C. DEAR READER: You could step back to admire how beautifull­y your daughter just made his point, by oversharin­g his concern about oversharin­g.

That would require a level of detachment, though, I suspect you haven’t achieved.

For one thing, you cite a financial arrangemen­t as a defense for an emotional one, and it doesn’t work that way. Ask anyone rearing aloof teenagers: They can depend on you utterly and break bread with you daily and keep you thoroughly, exquisitel­y shut out of their inner emotional lives, if they so choose. Being enmeshed on one front doesn’t guarantee it on others.

Nor does being in control on the financial front entitle you to control on another.

There is intimacy in child care, granted, especially since kids are so gleefully unfiltered when it comes to dishing on their parents. But you can still opt not to close that circuit, easily: (1) Don’t circulate what your daughter shares with you; (2) Don’t circulate what the kids burble to you, unless it’s utterly superficia­l or utterly serious; (3) Don’t give them unsolicite­d advice, rearrange their cupboards, correct their parenting techniques. If asked for advice, answer only minimally, leaving room for follow-up questions.

You can start applying these best practices on this very topic, since the oversharin­g issue isn’t about you, it’s strictly between husband and wife. Say so when your daughter brings it up: “We’ll be mindful not to butt in, starting now: You two need to work this out on your own.”

I’ll flag one thing that I hope doesn’t sabotage this advice. Abusers often isolate partners by demanding “privacy” — eavesdropp­ing on calls, say, and trying to clamp down on what’s shared. I don’t necessaril­y suspect it here but must be thorough.

Please see how your opinion has jumped into their finances, too, and withdraw it; whether you think renting is “wasteful” is irrelevant. Maybe rent money would be extremely well-spent toward their health and independen­ce as adults, spouses and parents.

And maybe charging them rent, which you then save for them, would help set them free? Just one idea toward a larger point: Hereafter, contribute only toward making yourselves obsolete. It’s a parent’s most precious gift.

Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. each Friday at washington­post.com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email

tellme@washpost.com

 ?? Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS ??
Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States