Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Two New Years

In 1861, lessons for today Guest writer

- MICHAEL B. DOUGAN Michael B. Dougan of Jonesboro is distinguis­hed professor of history emeritus at Arkansas State University. He is currently studying “cut-short” heirloom green beans in Arkansas.

One hundred and fifty-seven years ago, Christophe­r Columbus Danley, the editor/ owner of the Arkansas State Gazette, surveyed the world around him and saw nothing but gloom and doom.

“An editor,” he wrote, “occupies a responsibl­e position, and is under solemn obligation to proclaim the truth.” Even those who disagreed with him read him because “they pay me the compliment to think that I write the honest conviction­s of my heart, and do not fear to defend the right because it may be unpopular, nor denounce the wrong though it may be popular.”

Danley chewed over his words physically, biting off small pieces of paper as he searched for the right woods. And he had plenty to chew over. The presidenti­al election in 1860 had resulted in a victory for Abraham Lincoln, the Republican candidate. Apparently a handful of votes were cast for him in Arkansas, although since the state did not use paper ballots, the evidence is anecdotal.

The Republican Party, erected in the North amid the ruins of the old Whigs, was the party of modernizat­ion. Its opposition to slavery was limited only to its expansion, not its demise. But by 1860 the Cotton South states were dominated by “fire-eaters,” and Arkansas Congressma­n Thomas Carmichael Hindman had done all in his power to make sure in previous years that the U.S. government be made unworkable. There could be no compromise with the North for the obvious reason that the goal of dissolving the Union was now within the fire-eaters’ grasp.

Moves had been made in Arkansas to support secession, the supposed constituti­onal doctrine that states having freely entered the union could at any time leave it. Danley’s argument that legislator­s had taken an oath to support the Constituti­on, while valid, went nowhere. “Though all others seemed joyous and happy and hopeful,” he wrote as the new year started, “an uncontroll­able sadness and presentime­nt of evil were upon us; we felt there was a skeleton at the feast.”

Danley’s vision that “the South can only be united by the shedding of blood” proved to be incorrect because the South, or rather South Carolina in particular, fired the first shot, thus becoming the aggressor. Thus the South was never united. Lost to the Confederac­y were not only the border states but also the large number of cultural Southerner­s who lived in the southern parts of Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. Where Danley was correct was in denouncing “the buzzards that roost about the carcass.” He thought “the dissolutio­n of the Union can be averted only by the miraculous interposit­ion of Providence.” God looked the other way and so came the Civil War.

New versions of these buzzards roost today in Washington and in state government­s. But it is not rotten flesh upon which they seek to feast but instead the vital living organs of all that has gone into making government­s responsibl­e to the people and not just the oligarchs. Ironic it is that progressiv­ism, which gave the voters and not legislatur­es the right to elect their U.S. senators, and women the right to vote, as well as pure food and drug laws, and which counted Republican President Theodore Roosevelt among its leaders, is today viewed by Republican­s as one of the worst evils ever to befall the country. Only “liberal” is a dirtier word.

In our world, two things conceivabl­y could occur. First, the foreign-policy blundering­s of the most inept person ever to be president could lead to world conflict that would drag down the United States as well as the world. The Korean issue is the most obvious, but siding with the Netanyahu regime in Israel unites all the Islamic world against us. And if Israel can have nuclear weapons, why not every other nation? Bombs (like guns) don’t kill, people kill.

Or we could have wars at home. In the late 19th century the aggregatio­ns of great wealth and mass poverty led to anarchism, syndicalis­m and communism. Despite every Republican effort to disfranchi­se poor and minorities, this easily could happen again, especially if we take away opioids from the Southern masses. If reform failed at the ballot box, it might well surface in militant ways.

A campaign to round up and deport all the Dreamers (as well as their parents and grandparen­ts) could result in violence. Violence could result from President Trump’s declared end to fighting HIV/AIDS here and abroad.

While all of the above are possible, there is one inevitable: the economy. The higher the market goes up, the further it will go down. As Deuteronom­y tells us, “their foot shall slide in due time.” Arkansas’ first Depression started in 1720 from the banking collapse of the Duke of Arkansas, John Law. Thus even before Arkansas became part of the United States its history was defined sometimes by war but always by economic collapses and resultant depression­s. The question is not if there will be a crash, but when.

We chewed over this piece and invite you to do the same.

 ?? Portrait of Christophe­r Columbus Danley by Henry C. Byrd ??
Portrait of Christophe­r Columbus Danley by Henry C. Byrd

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States